Willpower glasses (TM)—a wearable food consumption monitor

ABSTRACT

This invention is a device to monitor caloric intake comprising: a wearable member that is worn in a manner similar to eyeglasses; and an EEG sensor, wherein indications that a person is probably eating are based on electromagnetic waves from the person&#39;s brain. In an example, this device can further comprise one or more automatic-imaging members that automatically take pictures when the person eats based on data from the EEG sensor.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application: is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 13/523,739 entitled “The Willpower Watch™: AWearable Food Consumption Monitor” by Robert A. Connor filed on Jun. 14,2012; and also claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 61/932,517 entitled “Nutrode™: Wearable EEG Monitor forModifying Food Consumption” by Robert A. Connor filed on Jan. 28, 2014.The entire contents of these related applications are incorporatedherein by reference.

FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

Not Applicable

SEQUENCE LISTING OR PROGRAM

Not Applicable

BACKGROUND Field of Invention

This invention relates to dieting, energy balance, and weightmanagement.

INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN ENERGY BALANCE AND WEIGHT MANAGEMENT

The United States population has some of the highest prevalence rates ofobese and overweight people in the world. Further, these rates haveincreased dramatically during recent decades. In the late 1990's, aroundone in five Americans was obese. Today, that figure has increased toaround one in three. It is estimated that around one in five Americanchildren is now obese. The prevalence of Americans who are generallyoverweight is estimated to be as high as two out of three.

This increase in the prevalence of Americans who are overweight or obesehas become one of the most common causes of health problems in theUnited States. Potential adverse health effects from obesity include:cancer (especially endometrial, breast, prostate, and colon cancers);cardiovascular disease (including heart attack and arterial sclerosis);diabetes (type 2); digestive diseases; gallbladder disease;hypertension; kidney failure; obstructive sleep apnea; orthopediccomplications; osteoarthritis; respiratory problems; stroke; metabolicsyndrome (including hypertension, abnormal lipid levels, and high bloodsugar); impairment of quality of life in general including stigma anddiscrimination; and even death. There are estimated to be over aquarter-million obesity-related deaths each year in the United States.The tangible costs to American society of obesity have been estimated atover $100 billion dollars per year. This does not include the intangiblecosts of human pain and suffering.

Obesity is a complex disorder with multiple interacting causal factorsincluding genetic factors, environmental factors, and behavioralfactors. A person's behavioral factors include the person's caloricintake (the types and quantities of food which the person consumes) andcaloric expenditure (the calories that the person burns in regularactivities and exercise). Energy balance is the net difference betweencaloric intake and caloric expenditure. Other factors being equal,energy balance surplus (caloric intake greater than caloric expenditure)causes weight gain and energy balance deficit (caloric intake less thancaloric expenditure) causes weight loss. There are many factors thatcontribute to obesity. Good approaches to weight management arecomprehensive in nature and engage the motivation of the person managingtheir own weight. Management of energy balance is a key part of anoverall system for weight management. The invention that will bedisclosed herein comprises a novel and useful technology that engagespeople in energy balance management as part of an overall system forweight management.

There are two key components to managing energy balance: (1) managingcaloric intake—the types and quantities of food consumed; and (2)managing caloric expenditure—the calories burned in daily activities andexercise. Both components are essential, but there have been somelarge-scale studies indicating that the increase in obesity in theUnited States has been predominantly caused by increased foodconsumption. People in the U.S. are now consuming large portion sizesand too many calories. Of these calories consumed, there is too muchsaturated fat and not enough vitamins and minerals. Many peopleconsistently underestimate the amount of food that they eat.

These adverse eating trends are fueling the increase in obesity despitethe fact that many people are really trying to eat less, eat better, andlose weight. The American Obesity Association (AOA) estimates thataround 30% of Americans are actively trying to lose weight. The averageAmerican female has tried six diets. It appears that many people want tomanage their food consumption, but the vast majority of these people areunsuccessful in doing so over the long term. Long-term compliance withdiets is notoriously low. With all of the exposure to food and foodadvertisements that tempt people in today's society, it appears thatmany people do not have enough willpower for long-term compliance withdiet planning. The novel invention that is disclosed herein can providethese people with a new and powerful tool for monitoring their foodconsumption and boosting their willpower to manage their energy balanceand weight over the long term.

As we will discuss in depth in the following section, there have beenmany efforts in the prior art to create technology to successfullymonitor and/or control food consumption and caloric intake. Some ofthese approaches involve surgical procedures or implants that reducefood consumption or limit absorption by the body of food that isconsumed. Some of these approaches have been successful in reducing thecalories that are ultimately absorbed by the body. However, surgicalprocedures tend to be invasive, expensive, have potentially-seriouscomplications, and are not suitable for everyone who wants to loseweight. Potential adverse health effects from surgical procedures toaddress obesity include: blood clots, bowel or stomach obstruction,diarrhea, dumping syndrome (including bloating, cramps, and diarrheaafter eating), flatulence, gallstones, hernia, hypoglycemia, infection,malnutrition (including low calcium, vitamins such as B-12, iron,protein, and thiamine), nausea, blockage of GI tract diagnostic tests,respiratory problems, stomach perforation, ulcers, and vomiting.

Due to these problems, non-surgical and non-implantable approaches areneeded for monitoring and controlling food consumption and caloricintake. Accordingly, the invention that will be disclosed herein, andthe accompanying review of the prior art, are focused on non-surgicalnon-implantable approaches to monitoring and managing food consumptionand caloric intake. We do not review surgical procedures or implantabledevices for addressing obesity.

We will discuss non-surgical non-implantable approaches to monitoringand managing caloric intake in the prior art in greater depth in thefollowing section. However, as part of this introduction to this field,we now briefly introduce some of the key limitations of currentnon-surgical non-implantable approaches. This introduces the unmet needfor better devices and methods to help people monitor and manage theirfood consumption and caloric intake.

The vast majority of non-surgical non-implantable approaches tomonitoring and managing food consumption in the prior art rely onpurely-manual (or computer-assisted manual) logging of food consumptionand/or calories. For decades, this was done on paper. Now this can bedone with the help of an application on a smart phone, electronic pad,or other mobile electronic device. However, even these computer-assisteddevices and methods still rely on human action by the person to recordwhat the person eats each time that they eat.

Since these food and calorie logging devices and methods depend onvoluntary human action each time that a person eats anything, even asnack, they are time-consuming and often cumbersome. They arenotoriously associated with delays in food recording, “caloric amnesia,”errors of omission, chronic under-estimation of portion sizes, and lowlong-term compliance. Also, it is tough to make them tamper-resistantbecause their operation depends on voluntary action. People can easily“cheat” by simply not recording some food items consumed. To makematters worse, their operation is conspicuous andpotentially-embarrassing in social situations such as group dining anddates. This further aggravates delays in food recording and causes lowlong-term compliance. The invention that will be disclosed hereinovercomes these problems.

In an effort to overcome these limitations of manual food and calorielogging, some approaches in the prior art measure food purchasesinstead. The assumption is that food purchases can be used as a proxyfor food consumed. However, food purchased by an individual is a poorestimate of how much food is actually consumed by that individual whenthe individual buys food for other people (such as their family), whenthe individual does not eat all of the food purchased, when food ispurchased at multiple venues using different methods, and when there isuncertainty concerning the specific time period wherein an individualeats the food. Further, approaches based on bar codes (or other foodidentification codes) are limited because not all food items at storeshave such codes and few food items served in restaurants and homes havesuch codes.

Other approaches are based on meal planning with pre-packaged foodportions and/or pre-specified meals. However, these meal planningapproaches do not allow people much choice in food selection. Thiscauses frustration, diet “cheating”, and low long-term compliance. It iseasy for people to circumvent such methods during periods of lowwillpower.

More recently, there have been new approaches to measuring foodconsumption that use cameras (or other mobile imaging devices) to takepictures of food prior to consumption. The intent is to make foodlogging easier. However, even these new image-based approaches in theprior art still require manual intervention to aim an imaging devicetoward a food source and to activate picture taking, each time theperson eats. Accordingly, even these image-based approaches in the priorart depend on voluntary human action. It is difficult, or evenimpossible, to make them entirely automatic, tamper-resistant, andinconspicuous. Due to these limitations, such devices and methods canstill lead to low long-term compliance.

There remains an unmet need for a non-invasive, automatic,tamper-resistant, and relatively-inconspicuous device and method formonitoring and measuring food consumption and caloric intake. Such adevice and method is needed to serve as part of an overall system forhuman energy balance and weight management to help address the obesityepidemic in the United States. The novel invention that will bedisclosed herein can help to meet this need. Before disclosing it,however, we first provide an in-depth review of the prior art, includingcategorization of the relevant prior art and discussion of thelimitations of each category of this prior art.

CATEGORIZATION AND REVIEW OF THE PRIOR ART

It can be challenging to classify prior art in a particular field intodiscrete categories. That is the case in the field of monitoring andmanaging caloric intake. There are hundreds of examples ofpotentially-relevant prior art related to monitoring and managingcaloric intake, ranging from manual food logging methods, to mobiledevice food-imaging applications, to eating timing modification.However, classification of the prior art into categories, even ifimperfect, is an invaluable tool for reviewing the prior art,identifying its limitations, and setting the stage for discussion of theinvention in subsequent sections. Towards this end, I now identify 13general categories of prior art, discuss the general limitations ofprior art in each category, and list examples of prior art which appearto be best classified into each category.

The 13 categories of prior art that I will now discuss are as follows:(1) manual or voice-based food consumption logging, (2) manual foodweighing, (3) monitoring of food purchases, (4) monitoring ofhand-to-mouth proximity, (5) external monitoring of chewing orswallowing, (6) external monitoring of muscle activity, (7) externalmonitoring of blood flow characteristics, (8) external monitoring ofstomach activity, (9) food imaging by mobile device, (10) food imagingby device worn on the body, (11) eating portion modification, (12)eating speed modification, and (13) eating frequency modification.Surgical and implantable devices and methods for addressing obesity arenot included.

1. Manual or Voice-Based Food Consumption Logging

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in this category dependon manual (or voice-based) intervention by a person to record foodconsumed each time that the person eats. In this category, basic“calorie counting” and “diet log” methods have been around in paper formfor several decades. More recently, various types of computer support(including mobile device applications) have been developed in an effortto make such manual food consumption logging easier. However, even thesenew computer applications remain dependent on the motivation andcompliance of the person to take the manual actions that are required torecord food consumed each time that the person eats. Long-termcompliance with manual food logging devices and methods is notoriouslylow. Also, people tend to under-estimate calories consumed, especiallyfor unstructured snacking behavior.

The limitations of devices and methods for measuring caloric intake thatdepend on manual (or voice-based) logging of food consumption includethe following. First, they depend on voluntary human action each timethat a person eats anything, even a snack. This makes such devices andmethods time-consuming and often cumbersome. This leads to delays infood recording, “caloric amnesia” and errors of omission, chronicunder-estimation of portion sizes, and low long-term compliance. Also,devices and methods that depend on voluntary human action are difficultto make tamper-resistant. It is easy for people to “cheat” with suchmethods by simply not recording all food items consumed. Further, adevice or method whose operation is conspicuous can be embarrassing insocial situations such as group meals and social dates. This causesdelays in food recording, frustration, and low long-term compliance.Finally, with respect to devices and methods which use bar codes (orother codes) to facilitate food logging, not all food items at storeshave such codes and few food items served in restaurants and homes havesuch codes.

The many devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in the priorart that appear to be based on manual or voice-based food consumptionlogging include: U.S. Pat. No. 4,100,401 (Tuft et al., Jul. 11, 1978,“Calorie Calculator-Chronometer”); U.S. Pat. No. 4,212,079 (Segar etal., Jul. 8, 1980, “Electronic Calorie Counter”); U.S. Pat. No.4,221,959 (Sessler, Sep. 9, 1980, “Checking Device for Checking the FoodIntake”); U.S. Pat. No. 4,310,316 (Thomann, Jan. 12, 1982, “Diet ControlApparatus”); U.S. Pat. No. 4,321,674 (Krames et al., Mar. 23, 1982,“Nutritional Value Accumulating and Display Device”); U.S. Pat. No.4,650,218 (Hawke, Mar. 17, 1987, “Method and Apparatus for ControllingCaloric Intake”); U.S. Pat. No. 4,686,624 (Blum et al., Aug. 11, 1987,“Portable Apparatus for Acquiring and Processing Data Relative to theDietetics and/or the Health of a Person”); U.S. Pat. No. 4,796,182(Duboff, Jan. 3, 1989, “Diet Monitor and Display Device”); U.S. Pat. No.4,951,197 (Mellinger, Aug. 21, 1990, “Weight Loss Management System”);U.S. Pat. No. 5,173,588 (Harrah, Dec. 22, 1992, “Food ConsumptionMonitor”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,478,989 (Shepley, Dec. 26, 1995, “NutritionalInformation System for Shoppers”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,542,420 (Goldman etal., Aug. 6, 1996, “Personalized Method and System for Storage,Communication, Analysis, and Processing of Health-Related Data”); U.S.Pat. No. 5,673,691 (Abrams et al., Oct. 7, 1997, “Apparatus to ControlDiet and Weight Using Human Behavior Modification Techniques”); U.S.Pat. No. 5,691,927 (Gump, Nov. 25, 1997, “Nutritional Aid and Method”);U.S. Pat. No. 5,704,350 (Williams, Jan. 6, 1998, “NutritionalMicrocomputer and Method”) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,729,479 (Golan, Mar. 17,1998, “Multifunctional Diet Calculator”).

U.S. Patents that appear to be classified in this category also include:U.S. Pat. No. 5,836,312 (Moore, Nov. 17, 1998, “Computer-Assisted Systemand Method for Adjudging the Effect of Consumable Intakes onPhysiological Parameters”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,839,901 (Karkanen, Nov. 24,1998, “Integrated Weight Loss Control Method”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,115(Shepley, Nov. 24, 1998, “Nutritional Information System for Shoppers”);U.S. Pat. No. 5,890,128 (Diaz et al., Mar. 30, 1999, “Personalized HandHeld Calorie Computer (ECC)”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,188 (Birkhoelzer etal., Nov. 23, 1999, “Method and Apparatus for Determining the EnergyBalance of a Living Subject on the Basis of Energy Used and NutritionIntake”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,024,281 (Shepley, Feb. 15, 2000, “NutritionalInformation System for Shoppers”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,032,676 (Moore, Mar.7, 2000, “Method for Correlating Consumable Intakes with PhysiologicalParameters”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,040,531 (Miller-Kovach et al., Mar. 21,2000, “Process for Controlling Body Weight”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,083,006(Coffman, Jul. 4, 2000, “Personalized Nutrition Planning”); U.S. Pat.No. 6,095,949 (Arai, Aug. 1, 2000, “Health Management Device”); U.S.Pat. No. 6,336,136 (Harris, Jan. 1, 2002, “Internet Weight ReductionSystem”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,341,295 (Stotler, Jan. 22, 2002, “VirtualReality Integrated Caloric Tabulator”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,478,736 (Mault,Nov. 12, 2002, “Integrated Calorie Management System”); U.S. Pat. No.6,506,152 (Lackey et al., Jan. 14, 2003, “Caloric Energy BalanceMonitor”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,553,386 (Alabaster, Apr. 22, 2003, “Systemand Method for Computerized Visual Diet Behavior Analysis andTraining”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,571,200 (Mault, May 27, 2003, “MonitoringCaloric Expenditure Resulting from Body Activity”); U.S. Pat. No.6,595,929 (Stivoric et al., Jul. 22, 2003, “System for Monitoring HealthWellness and Fitness Having a Method and Apparatus for ImprovedMeasurement of Heat Flow”); and U.S. Pat. No. 6,605,038 (Teller et al.,Aug. 12, 2003, “System for Monitoring Health Wellness and Fitness”).

U.S. Patents that appear to be classified in this category also include:U.S. Pat. No. 6,635,015 (Sagel, Oct. 21, 2003, “Body Weight ManagementSystem”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,675,041 (Dickinson, Jan. 6, 2004, “ElectronicApparatus and Method for Monitoring Net Calorie Intake”); U.S. Pat. No.6,694,182 (Yamazaki et al., Feb. 17, 2004, “Wearable CalorieCalculator”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,745,214 (Inoue et al., Jun. 1, 2004,“Calorie Control Apparatus with Voice Recognition”); U.S. Pat. No.6,856,938 (Kurtz, Feb. 15, 2005, “Weight Monitoring Computer”); U.S.Pat. No. 6,878,885 (Miller-Kovach et al., Apr. 12, 2005, “Process forControlling Body Weight”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,917,897 (Mork, Jul. 12, 2005,“Food and Exercise Calculator”); U.S. Pat. No. 7,020,508 (Stivoric etal., Mar. 28, 2006, “Apparatus for Detecting Human Physiological andContextual Information”); U.S. Pat. No. 7,261,690 (Teller et al., Aug.28, 2007, “Apparatus for Monitoring Health, Wellness and Fitness”); U.S.Pat. No. 7,285,090 (Stivoric et al., Oct. 23, 2007, “Apparatus forDetecting, Receiving, Deriving and Displaying Human Physiological andContextual Information”); U.S. Pat. No. 7,361,141 (Nissila et al., Apr.22, 2008, “Method and Device for Weight Management of Humans”); U.S.Pat. No. 7,500,937 (Hercules, Mar. 10, 2009, “Diet Compliance System”);U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,730 (Dugan, Dec. 28, 2010, “Methods and Apparatusfor Monitoring and Encouraging Health and Fitness”); U.S. Pat. No.7,949,506 (Hill et al., May 24, 2011, “Method for Determining andCompensating for a Weight Loss Energy Gap”); U.S. Pat. No. 7,959,567(Stivoric et al., Jun. 14, 2011, “Device to Enable Quick Entry ofCaloric Content”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,073,707 (Teller et al., Dec. 6, 2011,“System for Detecting Monitoring and Reporting an Individual'sPhysiological or Contextual Status”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,075,451 (Dugan,Dec. 13, 2011, “Methods and Apparatus for Monitoring and EncouragingHealth and Fitness”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,087,937 (Peplinski et al., Jan. 3,2012, “System and Method for Monitoring Weight and Nutrition”); and U.S.Pat. No. 8,157,731 (Teller et al., Apr. 17, 2012, “Method and Apparatusfor Auto Journaling of Continuous or Discrete Body States UtilizingPhysiological and/or Contextual Parameters”).

U.S. Patent Applications that appear to be classified in this categoryinclude: 20010049470 (Mault et al., Dec. 6, 2001, “Diet and ActivityMonitoring Device”); 20020062069 (Mault, May 23, 2002, “System andMethod of Integrated Calorie Management Using Interactive Television”);20020133378 (Mault et al., Sep. 19, 2002, “System and Method ofIntegrated Calorie Management”); 20020156351 (Sagel, Oct. 24, 2002,“Body Weight Management System”); 20030065257 (Mault et al., Apr. 3,2003, “Diet and Activity Monitoring Device”); 20030152607 (Mault, Aug.14, 2003, “Caloric Management System and Method with VoiceRecognition”); 20030165799 (Bisogno, Sep. 4, 2003, “Computer Program,Method, and System for Monitoring Nutrition Content of Consumables andfor Facilitating Menu Planning”); 20030219513 (Gordon, Nov. 27, 2003,“Personal Nutrition Control Method”); 20040034289 (Teller et al., Feb.19, 2004, “System for Monitoring Health, Wellness and Fitness”);20040133081 (Teller et al., Jul. 8, 2004, “Method and Apparatus for AutoJournaling of Continuous or Discrete Body States Utilizing Physiologicaland/or Contextual Parameters”); 20040152957 (Stivoric et al., Aug. 5,2004, “Apparatus for Detecting, Receiving, Deriving and Displaying HumanPhysiological and Contextual Information”); 20050004436 (Nissila et al.,Jan. 6, 2005, “Method and Device for Weight Management of Humans”);20050008994 (Bisogno, Jan. 13, 2005, “Computer Program, Method, andSystem for Monitoring Nutrition Content of Consumables and forFacilitating Menu Planning”); 20050113650 (Pacione et al., May 26, 2005,“System for Monitoring and Managing Body Weight and Other PhysiologicalConditions Including Iterative and Personalized Planning Interventionand Reporting Capability”); 20050247213 (Slilaty, Nov. 10, 2005, “Methodof Identifying Particular Attributes of Food Products Consistent withConsumer Needs and/or Desires”); 20050266385 (Bisogno, Dec. 1, 2005,“Computer Program, Method, and System for Monitoring Nutrition Contentof Consumables and for Facilitating Menu Planning”); 20060031102 (Telleret al., Feb. 9, 2006, “System for Detecting Monitoring and Reporting anIndividual's Physiological or Contextual Status”); 20060036395 (Shaya etal., Feb. 16, 2006, “Method and Apparatus for Measuring and ControllingFood Intake of an Individual”); 20060074716 (Tilles et al., Apr. 6,2006, “System and Method for Providing Customized Interactive andFlexible Nutritional Counseling”); 20060122474 (Teller et al., Jun. 8,2006, “Apparatus for Monitoring Health Wellness and Fitness”); and20060264730 (Stivoric et al., Nov. 23, 2006, “Apparatus for DetectingHuman Physiological and Contextual Information”).

U.S. Patent Applications that appear to be classified in this categoryalso include: 20070027366 (Osburn|Feb. 1, 2007, “Device and System forEntering and Monitoring Dietary Data”); 20070089335 (Smith et al., Apr.26, 2007, “Nutrient Consumption/Expenditure Planning and TrackingApparatus System and Method”); 20070106129 (Srivathsa et al., May 10,2007, “Dietary Monitoring System for Comprehensive Patient Management”);20070179355 (Rosen, Aug. 2, 2007, “Mobile Self-Management Compliance andNotification Method, System and Computer Program Product”); 20070208593(Hercules, Sep. 6, 2007, “Diet Compliance System”); 20080167538 (Telleret al., Jul. 10, 2008, “Method and Apparatus for Auto Journaling of BodyStates and Providing Derived Physiological States UtilizingPhysiological and/or Contextual Parameter”); 20080167539 (Teller et al.,Jul. 10, 2008, “Method and Apparatus for Auto Journaling of Body Statesand Providing Derived Physiological States Utilizing Physiologicaland/or Contextual Parameter”); 20080171920 (Teller et al., Jul. 17,2008, “Method and Apparatus for Auto Journaling of Body States andProviding Derived Physiological States Utilizing Physiological and/orContextual Parameter”); 20080171921 (Teller et al., Jul. 17, 2008,“Method and Apparatus for Auto Journaling of Body States and ProvidingDerived Physiological States Utilizing Physiological and/or ContextualParameter”); 20080171922 (Teller et al., Jul. 17, 2008, “Method andApparatus for Auto Journaling of Body States and Providing DerivedPhysiological States Utilizing Physiological and/or ContextualParameter”); 20080275309 (Stivoric et al., Nov. 6, 2008, “Input OutputDevice for Use with Body Monitor”); 20100057564 (Godsey et al., Mar. 4,2010, “System and Method for Fitness Motivation”); 20100062119(Miller-Kovach et al., Mar. 11, 2010, “Processes and Systems forAchieving and Assisting in Improved Nutrition”); 20100062402(Miller-Kovach et al., Mar. 11, 2010, “Processes and Systems Using andProducing Food Healthfulness Data Based on Linear Combinations ofNutrients”); 20100080875 (Miller-Kovach et al., Apr. 1, 2010, “Processesand Systems for Achieving and Assisting in Improved Nutrition Based onFood Energy Data and Relative Healthfulness Data”); 20100228160(Schweizer, Sep. 9, 2010, “Apparatus for Activity Monitoring”);20110087137 (Hanoun, Apr. 14, 2011, “Mobile Fitness and Personal CaloricManagement System”); 20120031805 (Stolarczyk, Feb. 9, 2012, “Daily MealPlanning System”); 20120072233 (Hanlon et al., Mar. 22, 2012, “MedicalHealth Information System for Health Assessment, Weight Management andMeal Planning”); 20120083669 (Abujbara, Apr. 5, 2012, “PersonalNutrition and Wellness Advisor”); and 20120096405 (Seo, Apr. 19, 2012,“Apparatus and Method for Diet Management”).

2. Manual Food Weighing

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in this categoryrequire that a person weighs food before it is consumed. Generally,these devices and methods use some type of stand-alone food scale orweight-measuring utensil to estimate the weight of food that isconsumed. Although some of these devices and methods seek to make thisweighing process as easy as possible (e.g. by incorporating a scale intoa utensil), they all require use of specialized equipment and humanintervention each time that a person eats. These devices and methodshave some of the same compliance problems that plague basic food loggingmethods. Will a person really weigh each bit of food on which they snackthroughout the day? Also, even with perfect compliance, whileweight-based devices can be useful for estimating the quantities of foodconsumed, they are not very useful for identifying the types of foodconsumed. Accordingly, devices and methods in this category, like basicfood logging methods, generally rely on human intervention for foodidentification.

The limitations of devices and methods for measuring caloric intake thatare based on scales and manual food weighing include the following. Suchdevices and methods depend on voluntary human action, at least for foodidentification, each time that a person eats. This makes themtime-consuming and results in low long-term compliance. People caneasily circumvent devices and methods that depend on voluntary humanaction. They are tough to make tamper-resistant. Also, devices andmethods for measuring caloric intake whose operation is conspicuous whena person eats are embarrassing in social situations such as group mealsand social dates. With respect to those devices and methods that rely onbar codes for food identification, not all food items at stores havesuch codes and few food items served in restaurants and homes have suchcodes. Finally, for those devices and methods in this category that havea fixed eating location with special food-weighing equipment, thesedevices and methods are constraining, anti-social, easy-to-circumvent,and lead to low long-term compliance.

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in the prior art thatappear to be based on manual food weighing include: U.S. Pat. No.4,387,777 (Ash, Jun. 14, 1983, “Calorie Counting Method and Apparatus”);U.S. Pat. No. 4,875,533 (Mihara et al., Oct. 24, 1989, “Automatic WeightDetecting Device”); U.S. Pat. No. 4,911,256 (Attikiouzel, Mar. 27, 1990,“Dietetic Measurement Apparatus”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,033,561 (Hettinger,Jul. 23, 1991, “Diet Control Device”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,233,520 (Kretschet al., Aug. 3, 1993, “Method and System for Measurement of Intake ofFoods, Nutrients and Other Food Components in the Diet”); U.S. Pat. No.5,388,043 (Hettinger, Feb. 7, 1995, “Diet and Behavioral ControlDevice”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,817,006 (Bergh et al., Oct. 6, 1998, “Methodand Apparatus for Measurement of Eating Speed”); and U.S. Pat. No.6,425,862 (Brown, Jul. 30, 2002, “Interactive Furniture for Dieters”).

U.S. Patent Applications that appear to be classified in this categoryinclude: 20020124017 (Mault, Sep. 5, 2002, “Personal Digital Assistantwith Food Scale Accessory”); 20060263750 (Gordon, Nov. 23, 2006,“Personal Nutrition Control Devices”); 20070028453 (Crow, Feb. 8, 2007,“Portion Control Serving Utensils”); 20070050058 (Zuziak et al., Mar. 1,2007, “Placemat for Calculating and Monitoring Calorie Intake”);20070173703 (Lee et al., Jul. 26, 2007, “Method, Apparatus, and Mediumfor Managing Weight by Using Calorie Consumption Information”);20080276461 (Gold, Nov. 13, 2008, “Eating Utensil Capable of AutomaticBite Counting”); 20110184247 (Contant et al., Jul. 28, 2011,“Comprehensive Management of Human Health”); and 20120055718 (Chen, Mar.8, 2012, “Electronic Scale for Recording Health Administration Data”).

3. Monitoring of Food Purchases

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in this category arebased on monitoring which food items a person purchases. One advantageof this approach is that it can be more automatic and less dependent onmanual intervention than devices and methods in previous categories.Another advantage of such devices and methods is that it is relativelyeasy to track food purchase transactions, at least at a given store.Itemized purchase transactions are often already recorded (e.g. by barcode scanning) for payment purposes.

However, there are several limitations with using food purchased by anindividual as a proxy for food consumed by that individual. First,people purchase food at multiple locations with multiple methods,including cash. It can be very difficult to collect and combineinformation concerning food purchases from various locations. Also,people do not always eat all the food that they purchase and do notalways purchase all the food that they eat. Many people shop for theirentire family. Some purchased food may be thrown out. Also, other familymembers may purchase food or food may be provided by non-family membersas hospitality or gifts. Finally, it can be tough trying to estimatefood consumption for a specific time period based on food purchasedbecause food purchased may be eaten before or after a specific timeperiod.

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in the prior art thatappear to be based on monitoring food purchases include: U.S. Pat. No.5,412,564 (Ecer, May 2, 1995, “System and Method for Diet Control”) and7769635 (Simons-Nikolova et al., Aug. 3, 2010, “Weight Management Systemwith Simple Data Input”); as well as U.S. Patent Applications20080255955 (Simons-Nikolova et al., Oct. 16, 2008, “Weight ManagementSystem with Simple Data Input”) and 20100205209 (Jokinen, Aug. 12, 2010,“Method and System for Monitoring a Personal Intake”).

4. Monitoring of Hand-to-Mouth Proximity

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in this categoryinvolve monitoring hand-to-mouth movements and hand-to-mouth proximity.One example of such a device and method is a wrist-mounted accelerometerthat detects hand movements that are generally associated with bringingfood to a person's mouth. One advantage of such a device is that itsrecording and analysis of hand movements can be relatively automatic.Another advantage of such a device is that it can be relativelyinconspicuous and thus not embarrassing for use in social eatingsituations.

However, there are significant limitations to devices and methods inthis category. First, such devices and methods do not provide goodinformation concerning the types of food consumed. In this respect, theygenerally rely on the same manual food identification methods that areused in basic food logging approaches. Second, although progress hasbeen made to differentiate hand motions indicating food consumption fromother types of hand motions (such as covering one's mouth or brushingone's teeth), there remains imprecision with respect to quantificationof food consumed based on analysis of hand-to-mouth movements orhand-to-mouth proximity. Third, it is tough to make such devices andmethods tamper-resistant. A person can use non-conventional handmovements to eat, use a non-monitored hand to eat, eat larger bite sizeswith each hand movement, use alternative utensils to bring food to theirmouth, or find other creative ways to bring food to their mouth that arenot recognized as food consumption by such a device.

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in the prior art thatappear to monitor hand-to-mouth motions and/or proximity include: U.S.Pat. No. 3,885,576 (Symmes, May 27, 1975, “Wrist Band Including aMercury Switch to Induce an Electric Shock”); U.S. Pat. No. 4,218,611(Cannon, Aug. 19, 1980, “Method and Apparatus for Controlling EatingBehavior”); U.S. Pat. No. 4,965,553 (DelBiondo et al., Oct. 23, 1990,“Hand-Near-Mouth Warning Device”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,299,356 (Maxwell,Apr. 5, 1994, “Diet Eating Utensil”); and U.S. Pat. No. 8,112,281 (Yeunget al., Feb. 7, 2012, “Accelerometer-Based Control of Wearable AudioRecorders”); as well as U.S. Patent Applications 20060197670 (Breibart,Sep. 7, 2006, “Method and Associated Device for Personal WeightControl”); 20070098856 (LePine, May 3, 2007, “Mealtime Eating RegulationDevice”); 20080276461 (Gold, Nov. 13, 2008, “Eating Utensil Capable ofAutomatic Bite Counting”); 20100194573 (Hoover et al., Aug. 5, 2010,“Weight Control Device”); 20100240962 (Contant, Sep. 23, 2010, “EatingUtensil to Monitor and Regulate Dietary Intake”); and 20120126983(Breibart, May 24, 2012, “Method and Associated Device for PersonalWeight Control or Weight Loss”).

5. External Monitoring of Chewing or Swallowing

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in this categoryinvolve external monitoring of chewing and/or swallowing. In variousexamples, these devices and methods monitor chewing and/or swallowing byanalyzing chewing or swallowing sounds or movements. Like monitoringdevices and methods in preceding categories, devices and methods in thiscategory can operate in a relatively automatic manner in order to detectgeneral eating activity and give a rough indication of the quantity offood consumed.

However, devices and methods in this category share many of thelimitations of hand-to-mouth monitoring in the previous category. First,such devices and methods do not provide much information concerning whattypes of foods or beverages are being consumed. In this respect, theyagain rely on manual food identification methods, with all of theirassociated compliance problems. Also, it can be tough to quantify theamount of food consumed based on the number of chewing or swallowingmotions. Different people chew their food to different extents andingest different amounts of food per swallow. Finally, such devices andmethods can be circumvented. A person can chew or swallow in an unusualmanner (to confuse or circumvent the device) or can put agenerally-solid food in a blender for consumption as a liquid (toconfuse or circumvent the device).

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in the prior art basedon monitoring chewing and/or swallowing sounds or movements include:U.S. Pat. No. 5,263,491 (Thornton, Nov. 23, 1993, “Ambulatory MetabolicMonitor”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,135,950 (Adams, Oct. 24, 2000, “E-FitMonitor”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,862 (Brown, Jul. 30, 2002, “InteractiveFurniture for Dieters”); and U.S. Pat. No. 7,914,468 (Shalon et al.,Mar. 29, 2011, “Systems and Methods for Monitoring and ModifyingBehavior”); as well as U.S. Patent Applications: 20050283096 (Chau etal., Dec. 22, 2005, “Apparatus and Method for Detecting SwallowingActivity”); 20060064037 (Shalon et al., Mar. 23, 2006, “Systems andMethods for Monitoring and Modifying Behavior”); 20070098856 (LePine,May 3, 2007, “Mealtime Eating Regulation Device”); 20100240962 (Contant,Sep. 23, 2010, “Eating Utensil to Monitor and Regulate Dietary Intake”);20110125063 (Shalon et al., May 26, 2011, “Systems and Methods forMonitoring and Modifying Behavior”); and 20110276312 (Shalon et al.,Nov. 10, 2011, “Device for Monitoring and Modifying Eating Behavior”).

6. External Monitoring of Muscle Activity

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in this categoryinvolve external monitoring of muscle activity (especiallyelectromagnetic signals from muscle activity) which indicates probablefood consumption. The pros and cons of such devices and methods aresimilar to those that monitor chewing and swallowing. Devices andmethods in this category are relatively automatic and can detect signalsthat indicate probable food consumption, but they are limited formeasuring the quantities of food consumed and are very limited foridentifying the types of food consumed. Devices and methods formeasuring caloric intake in the prior art based on monitoring(electromagnetic) muscle activity include: U.S. Pat. No. 4,355,645(Mitani et al., Oct. 26, 1982, “Device for Displaying Masticatory MuscleActivities”) and U.S. Pat. No. 7,914,468 (Shalon et al., Mar. 29, 2011,“Systems and Methods for Monitoring and Modifying Behavior”) as well asU.S. Patent Application 20080262557 (Brown, Oct. 23, 2008, “ObesityManagement System”).

7. External Monitoring of Blood Flow Characteristics

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in this categoryinvolve external monitoring of blood flow characteristics which indicateprobable food consumption. Examples of blood flow characteristicsinclude greater flow through tissue that is associated with foodconsumption. The pros and cons of these devices and methods are similarto those in previous categories that monitor chewing, swallowing, andmuscle activity. Devices and methods in this category can be automaticand detect likely food consumption, but are limited for measuring thequantities of food consumed and very limited for identifying the typesof food consumed. Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake inthe prior art based on monitoring blood flow characteristics include:U.S. Pat. No. 5,398,688 (Laniado, Mar. 21, 1995, “Method, System andInstrument for Monitoring Food Intake”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,893,406(Takeuchi et al., May 17, 2005, “Mastication Monitoring Device”); andU.S. Pat. No. 7,914,468 (Shalon et al., Mar. 29, 2011, “Systems andMethods for Monitoring and Modifying Behavior”); as well as U.S. PatentApplication 20040073142 (Takeuchi et al., Apr. 15, 2004, “MasticationMonitoring Device”).

8. External Monitoring of Stomach Activity

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in this categoryinvolve external monitoring of stomach activity which indicates probablefood consumption. Devices and methods in this category are relativelyautomatic and detect signals that indicate probable food consumption,but they are not precise for measuring the types and quantities of foodconsumed as a means to estimate caloric intake. Devices and methods formeasuring caloric intake in the prior art based on monitoring stomachactivity include: U.S. Pat. No. 4,823,808 (Clegg et al., Apr. 25, 1989,“Method for Control of Obesity, Overweight and Eating Disorders”) andU.S. Pat. No. 5,301,679 (Taylor, Apr. 12, 1994, “Method and System forAnalysis of Body Sounds”).

9. Food Imaging by Mobile Device

Devices and methods in this category estimate caloric intake based onanalysis of pictures of food taken by a mobile imaging device, such as acamera, mobile/smart phone, or electronic tablet. For classificationpurposes, we have differentiated between freestanding mobilefood-imaging devices that are not worn on a person's body (included inthis category) versus wearable food-imaging devices that are worn on aperson's body (included in the next category). This distinction isimportant with respect to: imaging directionality, imaging field ofvision, and which objects are within the imaging field of vision;estimation accuracy for the types and quantities of food actuallyconsumed; and image-taking automation, tamper-resistance, andcompliance.

Devices and methods that take pictures of food and automatically analyzethese pictures in order to identify foods to estimate caloric intake canbe superior to devices and methods in prior categories in some respects.However, there remain several limitations to devices and methods thatestimate caloric intake using freestanding mobile imaging devices.First, such mobile devices and methods for measuring caloric intakerequire a person to manually aim an imaging device each time that aperson eats. This is time-consuming (having to aim the field of vision),easy to circumvent (just don't use it for some food consumed), andpotentially embarrassing in social dining situations. This can lead tolow long-term compliance. Also, mobile devices and methods for measuringcaloric intake require a person to manually activate picture taking eachtime that a person eats anything. This makes such devices and methodseasy to circumvent (just don't “click the button”), easy to forget(especially for unstructured snacking), and potentially embarrassing insocial dining situations. This also leads to low long-term compliance.Even devices and methods in this category that have automated imageanalysis still depend on human intervention to aim and activate them.Any approach that depends on voluntary human action each time that aperson eats anything is difficult to make tamper-resistant. It is veryeasy for someone to “cheat” by simply not taking pictures of someconsumed food items.

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in the prior art thatappear to be based on food imaging by a mobile device include: U.S. Pat.No. 5,819,735 (Mansfield et al., Oct. 13, 1998, “Device and Method forMonitoring Dietary Intake of Calories and Nutrients”) and U.S. Pat. No.6,283,914 (Mansfield et al., Sep. 4, 2001, “Device and Method forMonitoring Dietary Intake of Calories and Nutrients”); as well as U.S.Patent Applications 20020027164 (Mault et al., Mar. 7, 2002, “PortableComputing Apparatus Particularly Useful in a Weight ManagementProgram”); 20030076983 (Cox, Apr. 24, 2003, “Personal Food Analyzer”);20030163354 (Shamoun, Aug. 28, 2003, “Device for Collecting andAnalyzing Nutritional Data and Method Therefor”); 20060189853 (Brown,Aug. 24, 2006, “Method and System for Improving Adherence with a DietProgram or Other Medical Regimen”); 20060229504 (Johnson, Oct. 12, 2006,“Methods and Systems for Lifestyle Management”); 20070030339 (Findlay etal., Feb. 8, 2007, “Method, System and Software for MonitoringCompliance”); 20070059672 (Shaw, Mar. 15, 2007, “Nutrition TrackingSystems and Methods”); 20080267444 (Simons-Nikolova et al., Oct. 30,2008, “Modifying a Person's Eating and Activity Habits”); 20090112800(Athsani, Apr. 30, 200, “System and Method for Visual ContextualSearch”); 20090176526 (Altman, Jul. 9, 2009, “Longitudinal PersonalHealth Management System Using Mobile Data Capture”); 20090219159(Morgenstern, Sep. 3, 2009, “Method and System for an ElectronicPersonal Trainer”); 20100111383 (Boushey et al., May 6, 2010, “DietaryAssessment System and Method”); 20100173269 (Puri et al., Jul. 8, 2010,“Food Recognition Using Visual Analysis and Speech Recognition”);20100332571 (Healey et al., Dec. 30, 2010, “Device Augmented FoodIdentification”); 20110182477 (Tamrakar et al., Jul. 28, 2011, “Methodfor Computing Food Volume in a Method for Analyzing Food”); 20110184247(Contant et al., Jul. 28, 2011, “Comprehensive Management of HumanHealth”); 20110318717 (Adamowicz, Dec. 29, 2011, “Personalized FoodIdentification and Nutrition Guidance System”); and 20120055718 (Chen,Mar. 8, 2012, “Electronic Scale for Recording Health AdministrationData”).

10. Food Imaging by Device Worn on the Body

Devices and methods in this category estimate caloric intake byanalyzing pictures of food taken from a mobile imaging device that isactually worn on a person's body. The food-imaging aspect of devices andmethods in this category provides superior food identification tonon-image-based devices and methods (all of the prior categories exceptthe preceding one for mobile imaging devices). As an advantage overfreestanding mobile imaging devices, the wearable nature of devices andmethods in this category enables a higher degree of automation andtamper-resistance than that which is possible with mobile devices.

Although there are potential advantages of devices and methods that usewearable imaging members to estimate caloric intake, the prior art inthis category does not take full advantage of them. There are severallimitations to devices and methods disclosed in the prior art in thiscategory that are overcome by the invention that will be disclosedherein in later sections. These limitations include the following. Someof the devices and methods in the prior art are very conspicuous. Forexample, one requires a person to wear a video camera on the top oftheir head while eating. This would be very embarrassing for use insocial dining situations. Further, it appears that wearable imagingdevices in the prior art only analyze potential food sources. This isuseful for identification of the types of food to which the person mayhave access, but is limited for estimating how much of these potentialfood sources the person actually consumes. This is particularlyproblematic in grocery stores or group dining situations wherein aperson eats only a small fraction of all the potential food sources thatcome into the field of vision of a wearable imaging member. Theinvention which will be disclosed herein overcomes all of theselimitations of the prior art in this category.

Devices and methods for measuring caloric intake in the prior art thatappear to be based on wearable imaging members include: U.S. Pat. No.6,508,762 (Karnieli, Jan. 21, 2003, “Method for Monitoring Food Intake”)and U.S. Pat. No. 6,513,532 (Mault et al., Feb. 4, 2003, “Diet andActivity-Monitoring Device”); as well as U.S. Patent Applications20010049470 (Mault et al., Dec. 6, 2001, “Diet and Activity MonitoringDevice”); 20020022774 (Karnieli, Feb. 21, 2002, “Method for MonitoringFood Intake”); 20020047867 (Mault et al., Apr. 25, 2002, “Image BasedDiet Logging”); 20020109600 (Mault et al., Aug. 15, 2002, “BodySupported Activity and Condition Monitor”); 20030208110 (Mault et al.,Nov. 6, 2003, “Physiological Monitoring Using Wrist-Mounted Device”);20090012433 (Fernstrom et al., Jan. 8, 2009, “Method, Apparatus andSystem for Food Intake and Physical Activity Assessment”); and20100049004 (Edman et al., Feb. 25, 2010, “Metabolic Energy MonitoringSystem”).

11. Eating Portion Modification

Devices and methods in this category are generally used for modificationof food consumption, but not measurement of food consumption. However, Ihave included them and this category in this review of the prior artbecause the technology is nonetheless generally relevant to theinvention disclosed herein. Devices and methods in this category usestandard-size food containers or standard-capacity serving utensils inan effort to standardize and reduce the portion sizes of food consumed.Regardless of whether such devices and methods are used for modificationof food consumption or measurement of food consumption, they all dependon voluntary human action for their operation. Food must be stored orserved using the standard-size tools. These devices and methods are notuseful for food identification and are not tamper-resistant. A personcan easily consume food without using the standard-size tools.

Devices and methods in the prior art that appear to be based on eatingportion modification include: U.S. Pat. No. 7,044,739 (Matson, May 16,2006, “System for Controlled Nutrition Consumption”) and U.S. PatentApplications 20050014111 (Matson, Jan. 20, 2005, “System for ControlledNutrition Consumption”) and 20100125181 (Hyde et al., May 20, 2010,“Food Content Detector”).

12. Eating Speed Modification

Devices and methods in this category are generally used for modificationof food consumption, but not measurement of food consumption. However, Ihave included them and this category in this review of the prior artbecause the technology is nonetheless generally relevant to theinvention disclosed herein. Various examples of devices and methods inthis category use timing mechanisms to slow down the rate of foodconsumption. The underlying idea is that there is a lag between whenfood is consumed and when that food registers with the brain to cause a“sense of fullness” (satiety). Slowing down the rate of food consumptiontriggers satiety earlier, thereby reducing the overall quantity of foodconsumed. Several of the devices and methods in this category have atimer that periodically signals when a person should take another biteof food. This is intended to modify the speed of food consumption.Regardless of whether devices and methods in this category are used formodification of food consumption or measurement of food consumption,they depend on voluntary human action. They do not work if the personignores the timer. They are not tamper-resistant because a person canjust ignore the timer or eat without the timer. Also, such devices andmethods are not useful for food identification.

Devices and methods in the prior art that appear to be based on eatingspeed modification include: U.S. Pat. No. 4,207,673 (DiGirolamo et al.,Jun. 17, 1980, “Cutlery”); U.S. Pat. No. 4,914,819 (Ash, Apr. 10, 1990,“Eating Utensil for Indicating When Food May be Eaten Therewith and aMethod for Using the Utensil”); U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,682 (Kerr et al.,Dec. 4, 1990, “Meal Minder Device”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,421,089 (Dubus etal., Jun. 6, 1995, “Fork with Timer”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,424,719 (Ravid,Jun. 13, 1995, “Consumption Control”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,850(Hanapole, Oct. 8, 1996, “Food Intake Timer”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,908,301(Lutz, Jun. 1, 1999, “Method and Device for Modifying Behavior”); U.S.Pat. No. 6,473,368 (Stanfield, Oct. 29, 2002, “Consumption Controller”);U.S. Pat. No. 6,765,488 (Stanfield, Jul. 20, 2004, “Enhanced ConsumptionController”); as well as U.S. Patent Applications 20080137486 (Czarenket al., Jun. 12, 2008, “Diet Watch”); 20090253105 (Lepine, Oct. 8, 2009,“Device for Regulating Eating by Measuring Potential”); 20120021388(Arbuckle et al., Jan. 26, 2012, “System and Method for WeightManagement”).

13. Eating Frequency Modification

Devices and methods in this category are generally used for modificationof food consumption, not measurement of food consumption. However, Ihave included them in this review because the technology is nonethelessgenerally relevant. In an example, such a device and method can involvestoring food in containers or locations with time-limited access. Theintent is to reduce between-meal snacking by only allowing access tofood at specified times. However, such devices and methods only work inrestrictive environments which do not permit a person to purchase (orotherwise access) food by other means. Otherwise, these devices andmethods are easy for a person to circumvent.

An example of a device and method in the prior art that appears to bebased on eating frequency modification is U.S. patent 20050146419(Porter, Jul. 7, 2005, “Programmable Restricted Access Food StorageContainer and Behavior Modification Assistant”).

SUMMARY OF THIS INVENTION

This invention is a device to monitor caloric intake comprising: awearable member that is worn in a manner similar to eyeglasses; and anEEG sensor, wherein indications that a person is probably eating arebased on electromagnetic waves from the person's brain. In an example,this device can further comprise one or more automatic-imaging membersthat automatically take pictures when the person eats based on data fromthe EEG sensor.

INTRODUCTION TO THE FIGURES

FIGS. 1 and 2 show two sequential views of two opposite-facing camerasthat are worn on band around a person's wrist.

FIGS. 3 and 4 show pictures of the person's mouth and of a food sourcefrom the perspectives of these two cameras.

FIGS. 5 and 6 show one camera worn on a band around the person's wrist.

FIGS. 7 and 8 show a camera's field of vision automatically shifts asfood moves toward the person's mouth.

FIGS. 9-14 show a six-picture sequence of food consumption.

FIGS. 15 and 16 show a two-picture sequence of how the field of visionfrom a single wrist-worn camera shifts as the person brings food up totheir mouth.

FIGS. 17 and 18 show a two-picture sequence of how the fields of visionfrom two wrist-worn cameras shift as the person brings food up to theirmouth.

FIGS. 19-21 show an example of how a device can be tamper resistant bymonitoring the line of sight to the person's mouth and responding ifthis line of sight is obstructed.

FIG. 22 shows an example of how a device can be tamper-resistant using afirst imaging member to monitor the person's mouth and a second imagingmember to scan for food sources.

FIGS. 23-30 show two four-picture sequences taken by a wrist-wornprototype wherein these picture sequences encompass the person's mouthand a food source.

FIGS. 31 and 32 show an example of an eyewear-based device that can beused to measure and/or modify a person's food consumption.

FIG. 33 shows an example of an eyewear-based device with a loop over thetop of a person's head, wherein this device can be used to measureand/or modify a person's food consumption.

FIG. 34 shows an example of an eyewear-based device with a posteriorportion which starts near the bottom of a person's ear and loops overthe top of their head, wherein this device can be used to measure and/ormodify a person's food consumption.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

Before going into a detailed description of the figures, it is importantto first define three terms that are used repeatedly in the description.The first term, “food,” is broadly defined to include liquidnourishment, such as beverages, in addition to solid food.

The second term, “reachable food source,” is defined as a source of foodthat a person can access and from which they can bring a piece (orportion) of food to their mouth by moving their arm and hand. Arm andhand movement can include movement of the person's shoulder, elbow,wrist, and finger joints. In various examples, a reachable food sourcecan be selected from the group consisting of: food on a plate, food in abowl, food in a glass, food in a cup, food in a bottle, food in a can,food in a package, food in a container, food in a wrapper, food in abag, food in a box, food on a table, food on a counter, food on a shelf,and food in a refrigerator.

The third term, “food consumption pathway,” is defined as a path inspace that is traveled by (a piece of) food from a reachable food sourceto a person's mouth as the person eats. The distal endpoint of a foodconsumption pathway is the reachable food source and the proximalendpoint of a food consumption pathway is the person's mouth. In variousexamples, food may be moved along the food consumption pathway bycontact with a member selected from the group consisting of: a utensil;a beverage container; the person's fingers; and the person's hand.

The following figures, FIGS. 1-33[32], do not limit the fullgeneralizability of the claims.

We now begin the description of FIGS. 1 and 2 with an introductoryoverview. A detailed description will follow. FIGS. 1 and 2 show anexample of a device and method for automatically monitoring andestimating human caloric intake. In this example, the device and methodcomprise an automatic-imaging member that is worn on a person's wrist.This imaging member has two cameras attached to a wrist band on opposite(narrow) sides of the person's wrist.

These two cameras take pictures of a reachable food source and theperson's mouth. These pictures are used to estimate, in an automatic andtamper-resistant manner, the types and quantities of food consumed bythe person. Information on food consumed, in turn, is used to estimatethe person's caloric intake. As the person eats, these two cameras ofthe automatic-imaging member take pictures of a reachable food sourceand the person's mouth. These pictures are analyzed, using patternrecognition or other image-analyzing methods, to estimate the types andquantities of food that the person consumes. In this example, thesepictures are motion pictures (e.g. videos). In another example, thesepictures may be still-frame pictures.

We now discuss FIGS. 1 and 2, including their components, in detail.FIG. 1 shows person 101 seated at table 104 wherein this person is usingtheir arm 102 and hand 103 to access food 106 on plate 105 located ontable 104. In this example in FIGS. 1 and 2, food 106 on plate 105comprises a reachable food source. In this example, person 101 is shownpicking up a piece of food 106 from the reachable food source usingutensil 107. In various examples, a food source may be selected from thegroup consisting of: food on a plate, food in a bowl, food in a glass,food in a cup, food in a bottle, food in a can, food in a package, foodin a container, food in a wrapper, food in a bag, food in a box, food ona table, food on a counter, food on a shelf, and food in a refrigerator.

In this example, the person is wearing an automatic-imaging membercomprised of a wrist band 108 to which are attached two cameras, 109 and110, on the opposite (narrow) sides of the person's wrist. Camera 109takes pictures within field of vision 111. Camera 110 takes pictureswithin field of vision 112. Each field of vision, 111 and 112, isrepresented in these figures by a dotted-line conical shape. The narrowtip of the dotted-line cone is at the camera's aperture and the circularbase of the cone represents the camera's field of vision at a finitefocal distance from the camera's aperture.

In this example, camera 109 is positioned on the person's wrist at alocation from which it takes pictures along an imaging vector that isdirected generally upward from the automatic-imaging member toward theperson's mouth as the person eats. In this example, camera 110 ispositioned on the person's wrist at a location from which it takespictures along an imaging vector that is directed generally downwardfrom the automatic-imaging member toward a reachable food source as theperson eats. These imaging vectors are represented in FIG. 1 by thefields of vision, 111 and 112, indicated by cone-shaped dotted-lineconfigurations. The narrow end of the cone represents the aperture ofthe camera and the circular end of the cone represents a focal distanceof the field of vision as seen by the camera. Although theoretically thefield of vision could extend outward in an infinite manner from theaperture, we show a finite length cone to represent a finite focallength for a camera's field of vision.

Field of vision 111 from camera 109 is represented in FIG. 1 by agenerally upward-facing cone-shaped configuration of dotted lines thatgenerally encompasses the person's mouth and face as the person eats.Field of vision 112 from camera 110 is represented in FIG. 1 by agenerally downward-facing cone-shaped configuration of dotted lines thatgenerally encompasses the reachable food source as the person eats.

This device and method of taking pictures of both a reachable foodsource and the person's mouth, while a person eats, can do a much betterjob of estimating the types and quantities of food actually consumedthan one of the devices or methods in the prior art that only takespictures of either a reachable food source or the person's mouth. Thereis prior art that uses imaging to identify food that requires a personto manually aim a camera toward a food source and then manually take apicture of the food source. Such prior art does not take also picturesof the person's mouth. There are multiple disadvantages with this priorart. We will discuss later the disadvantages of requiring manualintervention to aim a camera and push a button to take a picture. Fornow, we discuss the disadvantages of prior art that only takes picturesof a reachable food source or only takes pictures of the person's mouth,but not both.

First, let us consider a “source-only” imaging device, such as those inthe prior art, that only takes pictures of a food source within areachable distance of the person and does not also take pictures of theperson's mouth. Using a “source-only” device, it is very difficult toknow whether the person actually consumes the food that is seen in thepictures. A “source-only” imaging device can be helpful in indentifyingwhat types of foods the person has reachable access to, and mightpossibly eat, but such a device is limited as means for measuring howmuch of these foods the person actually consumes. For example, considera person walking through a grocery store. As the person walks throughthe store, a wide variety of food sources in various packages andcontainers come into a wearable camera's field of vision. However, thevast majority of these food sources are ones that the person neverconsumes. The person only actually consumes those foods that the personbuys and consumes later. An automatic wearable imaging system that onlytakes pictures of reachable food sources would be very limited fordetermining how many of these reachable food sources are actuallyconsumed by the person.

One could try to address this problem by making the picture-takingprocess a manual process rather than an automatic process. One couldhave an imaging system that requires human intervention to actively aima camera (e.g. a mobile imaging device) at a food source and alsorequire human intervention (to click a button) to indicate that theperson is actually going to consume that food. However, relying on sucha manual process for caloric intake monitoring makes this processtotally dependent on the person's compliance. Even if a person wants tocomply, it can be tough for a person to manually aim a camera and takepictures each time that the person snacks on something. If the persondoes not want to comply, the situation is even worse. It is easy for aperson to thwart a monitoring process that relies on manualintervention. All that a person needs to do to thwart the process is tonot take pictures of something that they eat.

A manual imaging system is only marginally better than old-fashioned“calorie counting” by writing down what a person eats on a piece ofpaper or entering it into a computer. If a person buys a half-gallon ofice cream and consumes it without manually taking a picture of theice-cream, either intentionally or by mistaken omission, then the devicethat relies on a manual process is clueless with respect to thosecalories consumed. A “source-only” imaging device makes it difficult, ifnot impossible, to track food actually consumed without manualintervention. Further, requiring manual intervention to recordconsumption makes it difficult, if not impossible, to fully automatecalorie monitoring and estimation.

As another example of the limitations of a “source-only” imaging device,consider the situation of a person sitting at a table with many otherdiners wherein the table is set with food in family-style communalserving dishes. These family-style dishes are passed around to servefood to everyone around the table. It would be challenging for a“source-only” imaging device to automatically differentiate betweenthese communal serving dishes and a person's individual plate. Whathappens when the person's plate is removed or replaced? What happenswhen the person does not eat all of the food on their plate? Theseexamples highlight the limitations of a device and method that onlytakes pictures of a reachable food source, without also taking picturesof the person's mouth.

Pattern recognition software can identify the type of food at areachable food source by: analyzing the food's shape, color, texture,and volume; or by analyzing the food's packaging. However, it is muchmore difficult for a device to identify a piece (or portion) of foodthat is obscured within in the scoop of a spoon, hidden within a cup,cut and then pierced by the tines of a fork, or clutched inpartially-closed hand as it is brought up to the person's mouth.

For example, pattern recognition software could identify a bowl ofpeanuts on a table, but would have a tough time identifying a couplepeanuts held in the palm of a person's partially-closed hand as theymove from the bowl to the person's mouth. It is difficult to get a lineof sight from a wearable imaging member to something inside the person'shand as it travels along the food consumption pathway. For thesereasons, a “mouth-only” imaging device may be useful for estimating thequantity of food consumed (possibly based on the number of foodconsumption pathway motions, chewing motions, swallowing motions, or acombination thereof) but is limited for identifying the types of foodsconsumed, without having food source images as well.

We have discussed the limitations of “source-only” and “mouth-only”prior art that images only a reachable food source or only a person'smouth. This present invention can be an improvement over this prior artwhen it comprises a device and method that automatically estimates thetypes and quantities of food actually consumed based on pictures of botha reachable food source and the person's mouth. Having both such imagesprovides better information than either separately. Pictures of areachable food source may be particularly useful for identifying thetypes of food available to the person for potential consumption.Pictures of the person's mouth (including food traveling the foodconsumption pathway and food-mouth interaction such as chewing andswallowing) may be particularly useful for identifying the quantity offood consumed by the person. Combining both images in an integratedanalysis provides more accurate estimation of the types and quantitiesof food actually consumed by the person. This information, in turn,provides better estimation of caloric intake by the person.

The fact that this present invention is wearable further enhances itssuperiority over prior art that is non-wearable. It is possible to havea non-wearable imaging device that can be manually positioned (on atable or other surface) to be aimed toward an eating person, such thatits field of vision includes both a food source and the person's mouth.In theory, every time the person eats a meal or takes a snack, theperson could: take out an imaging device (such as a smart phone); placethe device on a nearby surface (such as a table, bar, or chair);manually point the device toward them so that both the food source andtheir mouth are in the field of vision; and manually push a button toinitiate picture taking before they start eating. However, this manualprocess with a non-wearable device is highly dependent on the person'scompliance with this labor-intensive and possibly-embarrassing process.

Even if a person has good intentions with respect to compliance, it isexpecting a lot for a person to carry around a device and to set it upat just the right direction each time that the person reaches for a mealor snack. How many people, particularly people struggling with theirweight and self-image, would want to conspicuously bring out a mobiledevice, place it on a table, and manually aim it toward themselves whenthey eat, especially when they are out to eat with friends or on a date?Even if this person has good intentions with respect to compliance witha non-wearable food-imaging device, it is very unlikely that compliancewould be high. The situation would get even worse if the person istempted to obstruct the operation of the device to cheat on their“diet.” With a non-wearable device, tampering with the operation of thedevice is easy as pie (literally). All the person has to do is to failto properly place and activate the imaging device when they snack.

It is difficult to design a non-wearable imaging device that takespictures, in an automatic and tamper-resistant manner, of both a foodsource and the person's mouth whenever the person eats. Is it easier todesign a wearable imaging device that takes pictures, in an automaticand tamper-resistant manner, of a food source and the person's mouthwhenever the person eats. Since the device and method disclosed hereinis wearable, it is an improvement over non-wearable prior art, even ifthat prior art could be used to manually take pictures of a food sourceand a person's mouth.

The fact that the device and method disclosed herein is wearable makesit less dependent on human intervention, easier to automate, and easierto make tamper-resistant. With the present invention, there is norequirement that a person must carry around a mobile device, place it onan external surface, and aim it toward a food source and their mouthevery time that they eat in order to track total caloric intake. Thispresent device, being wearable and automatic, goes with the person whereever they go and automatically takes pictures whenever they eat, withoutthe need for human intervention.

In an example, this device may have an unobtrusive, or even attractive,design like a piece of jewelry. In various examples, this device maylook similar to an attractive wrist watch, bracelet, finger ring,necklace, or ear ring.

For measuring total caloric intake, ideally it is desirable to have awearable device and method that automatically monitors and estimatescaloric intake in a comprehensive and involuntary manner. The automaticand involuntary nature of a device and method will enhance accuracy andcompliance. This present invention makes significant progress towardthis goal, especially as compared to the limitations of relevant priorart. There are devices and methods in the prior art that assist inmanual calorie counting, but they are heavily reliant on the person'scompliance. The prior art does not appear to disclose a wearable,automatic, tamper-resistant, image-based device or method that takespictures of a food source and a person's mouth in order to estimate theperson's caloric intake.

The fact that this device and method incorporates pictures of both afood source and the person's mouth, while a person eats, makes it muchmore accurate than prior art that takes pictures of only a food sourceor only the person's mouth. The wearable nature of this invention makesit less reliant on manual activation, and much more automatic in itsimaging operation, than non-wearable devices. This present device doesnot depend on properly placing, aiming, and activating an imaging memberevery time a person eats. This device and method operates in anautomatic manner and is tamper resistant. All of these features combineto make this invention a more accurate and dependable device and methodof monitoring and measuring human caloric intake than devices andmethods in the prior art. This present invention can serve well as thecaloric-intake measuring component of an overall system of human energybalance and weight management.

In the example that is shown in FIG. 1, the pictures of the person'smouth and the pictures of the reachable food source that are taken bycameras 109 and 110 (part of a wrist-worn automatic-imaging member) aretransmitted wirelessly to image-analyzing member 113 that is wornelsewhere on the person. In this example, image-analyzing member 113automatically analyzes these images to estimate the types and quantitiesof food consumed by the person. There are many methods of image analysisand pattern recognition in the prior art and the precise method of imageanalysis is not central to this invention. Accordingly, the precisemethod of image analysis is not specified herein.

In an example, this invention includes an image-analyzing member thatuses one or more methods selected from the group consisting of: patternrecognition or identification; human motion recognition oridentification; face recognition or identification; gesture recognitionor identification; food recognition or identification; word recognitionor identification; logo recognition or identification; bar coderecognition or identification; and 3D modeling.

In an example, this invention includes an image-analyzing member thatanalyzes one or more factors selected from the group consisting of:number of reachable food sources; types of reachable food sources;changes in the volume of food at a reachable food source; number oftimes that the person brings food to their mouth; sizes of portions offood that the person brings to their mouth; number of chewing movements;frequency or speed of chewing movements; and number of swallowingmovements.

In an example, this invention includes an image-analyzing member thatprovides an initial estimate of the types and quantities of foodconsumed by the person and this initial estimate is then refined byhuman interaction and/or evaluation.

In an example, this invention includes wireless communication from afirst wearable member (that takes pictures of a reachable food sourceand a person's mouth) to a second wearable member (that analyzes thesepictures to estimate the types and quantities of food consumed by theperson). In another example, this invention may include wirelesscommunication from a wearable member (that takes pictures of a reachablefood source and a person's mouth) to a non-wearable member (thatanalyzes these pictures to estimate the types and quantities of foodconsumed by the person). In another example, this invention may includea single wearable member that takes and analyzes pictures, of areachable food source and a person's mouth, to estimate the types andquantities of food consumed by the person.

In the example that is shown in FIG. 1, an automatic-imaging member isworn around the person's wrist. Accordingly, the automatic-imagingmember moves as food travels along the food consumption pathway. Thismeans that the imaging vectors and the fields of vision, 111 and 112,from the two cameras, 109 and 110, that are located on thisautomatic-imaging member, shift as the person eats.

In this example, the fields of vision from these two cameras on theautomatic-imaging member automatically and collectively encompass theperson's mouth and a reachable food source, from at least somelocations, as the automatic-imaging member moves when food travels alongthe food consumption pathway. In this example, this movement allows theautomatic-imaging member to take pictures of both the person's mouth andthe reachable food source, as the person eats, without the need forhuman intervention to manually aim cameras toward either the person'smouth or a reachable food source, when the person eats.

The reachable food source and the person's mouth do not need to bewithin the fields of vision, 111 and 112, at all times in order for thedevice and method to accurately estimate food consumed. As long as thereachable food source and the person's mouth are encompassed by thefield of vision from at least one of the two cameras at least onceduring each movement cycle along the food consumption pathway, thedevice and method should be able to reasonably interpolate missingintervals and to estimate the types and quantities of food consumed.

FIG. 2 shows the same example of the device and method for automaticallymonitoring and estimating caloric intake that was shown in FIG. 1, butat a later point as food moves along the food consumption pathway. InFIG. 2, a piece of food has traveled from the reachable food source tothe person's mouth via utensil 107. In FIG. 2, person 101 has bent theirarm 102 and rotated their hand 103 to bring this piece of food, onutensil 107, up to their mouth. In FIG. 2, field of vision 112 fromcamera 110, located on the distal side of the person's wrist, now morefully encompasses the reachable food source. Also, field of vision 111from camera 109, located on the proximal side of the person's wrist, nowcaptures the interaction between the piece of food and the person'smouth.

FIGS. 3 and 4 provide additional insight into how this device and methodfor monitoring and estimating caloric intake works. FIGS. 3 and 4 showstill-frame views of the person's mouth and the reachable food source ascaptured by the fields of vision, 111 and 112, from the two cameras, 109and 110, worn on the person's wrist, as the person eats. In FIGS. 3 and4, the boundaries of fields of vision 111 and 112 are represented bydotted-line circles. These dotted-line circles correspond to thecircular ends of the dotted-line conical fields of vision that are shownin FIG. 2.

For example, FIG. 2 shows a side view of camera 109 with conical fieldof vision 111 extending outwards from the camera aperture and upwardstoward the person's mouth. FIG. 3 shows this same field of vision 111from the perspective of the camera aperture. In FIG. 3, the person'smouth is encompassed by the circular end of the conical field of vision111 that was shown in FIG. 2. In this manner, FIG. 3 shows a close-upview of utensil 107, held by hand 103, as it inserts a piece of foodinto the person's mouth.

As another example, FIG. 2 shows a side view of camera 110 with conicalfield of vision 112 extending outwards from the camera aperture anddownwards toward the reachable food source. In this example, thereachable food source is food 106 on plate 105. FIG. 4 shows this samefield of vision 112 from the perspective of the camera aperture. In FIG.4, the reachable food source is encompassed by the circular end of theconical field of vision 112 that was shown in FIG. 2. In this manner,FIG. 4 shows a close-up view of food 106 on plate 105.

The example for monitoring and estimating human caloric intake that isshown in FIGS. 1-4 comprises a wearable imaging device. In variousexamples, this invention can be a device and method for measuringcaloric intake that comprises one or more automatic-imaging members thatare worn on a person at one or more locations from which these membersautomatically take (still or motion) pictures of the person's mouth asthe person eats and automatically take (still or motion) pictures of areachable food source as the person eats. In this example, these imagesare automatically analyzed to estimate the types and quantities of foodactually consumed by the person.

In an example, there may be one automatic-imaging member that takespictures of both the person's mouth and a reachable food source. In anexample, there may be two or more automatic-imaging members, worn on oneor more locations on a person, that collectively and automatically takepictures of the person's mouth when the person eats and pictures of areachable food source when the person eats. In an example, this picturetaking can occur in an automatic and tamper-resistant manner as theperson eats.

In various examples, one or more imaging devices worn on a person's bodytake pictures of food at multiple points as it moves along the foodconsumption pathway. In various examples, this invention comprises awearable, mobile, calorie-input-measuring device that automaticallyrecords and analyzes food images in order to detect and measure humancaloric input. In various examples, this invention comprises a wearable,mobile, energy-input-measuring device that automatically analyzes foodimages to measure human energy input.

In an example, this device and method comprise one or more imagingmembers that take pictures of: food at a food source; a person's mouth;and interaction between food and the person's mouth. The interactionbetween the person's mouth and food can include biting, chewing, andswallowing. In an example, utensils or beverage-holding members may beused as intermediaries between the person's hand and food. In anexample, this invention comprises an imaging device that automaticallytakes pictures of the interaction between food and the person's mouth asthe person eats. In an example, this invention comprises a wearabledevice that takes pictures of a reachable food source that is located infront of the person.

In an example, this invention comprises a method of estimating aperson's caloric intake that includes the step of having the person wearone or more imaging devices, wherein these imaging devices collectivelyand automatically take pictures of a reachable food source and theperson's mouth. In an example, this invention comprises a method ofmeasuring a person's caloric intake that includes having the person wearone or more automatic-imaging members, at one or more locations on theperson, from which locations these members are able to collectively andautomatically take pictures of the person's mouth as the person eats andtake pictures of a reachable food source as the person eats.

In the example that is shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, two cameras, 109 and 110,are worn on the narrow sides of the person's wrist, between theposterior and anterior surfaces of the wrist, such that the moving fieldof vision from the first of these cameras automatically encompasses theperson's mouth (as the person moves their arm when they eat) and themoving field of vision from the second of these cameras automaticallyencompasses the reachable food source (as the person moves their armwhen they eat). This embodiment of the invention is comparable to awrist-watch that has been rotated 90 degrees around the person's wrist,with a first camera located where the watch face would be and a secondcamera located on the opposite side of the wrist.

In another example, this device and method can comprise anautomatic-imaging member with a single wide-angle camera that is worn onthe narrow side of a person's wrist or upper arm, in a manner similar towearing a watch or bracelet that is rotated approximately 90 degrees.This automatic-imaging member can automatically take pictures of theperson's mouth, a reachable food source, or both as the person movestheir arm and hand as the person eats. In another example, this deviceand method can comprise an automatic-imaging member with a singlewide-angle camera that is worn on the anterior surface of a person'swrist or upper arm, in a manner similar to wearing a watch or braceletthat is rotated approximately 180 degrees. This automatic-imaging memberautomatically takes pictures of the person's mouth, a reachable foodsource, or both as the person moves their arm and hand as the personeats. In another example, this device and method can comprise anautomatic-imaging member that is worn on a person's finger in a mannersimilar to wearing a finger ring, such that the automatic-imaging memberautomatically takes pictures of the person's mouth, a reachable foodsource, or both as the person moves their arm and hand as the personeats.

In various examples, this invention comprises a caloric-input measuringmember that automatically estimates a person's caloric intake based onanalysis of pictures taken by one or more cameras worn on the person'swrist, hand, finger, or arm. In various examples, this inventionincludes one or more automatic-imaging members worn on a body memberselected from the group consisting of: wrist, hand, finger, upper arm,and lower arm. In various examples, this invention includes one or moreautomatic-imaging members that are worn in a manner similar to awearable member selected from the group consisting of: wrist watch;bracelet; arm band; and finger ring.

In various examples of this device and method, the fields of vision fromone or more automatic-imaging members worn on the person's wrist, hand,finger, or arm are shifted by movement of the person's arm bringing foodto their mouth along the food consumption pathway. In an example, thismovement causes the fields of vision from these one or moreautomatic-imaging members to collectively and automatically encompassthe person's mouth and a reachable food source.

In various examples, this invention includes one or moreautomatic-imaging members that are worn on a body member selected fromthe group consisting of: neck; head; and torso. In various examples,this invention includes one or more automatic-imaging members that areworn in a manner similar to a wearable member selected from the groupconsisting of: necklace; pendant, dog tags; brooch; cufflink; ear ring;eyeglasses; wearable mouth microphone; and hearing aid.

In an example, this device and method comprise at least two cameras orother imaging members. A first camera may be worn on a location on thehuman body from which it takes pictures along an imaging vector whichpoints toward the person's mouth while the person eats. A second cameramay be worn on a location on the human body from which it takes picturesalong an imaging vector which points toward a reachable food source. Inan example, this invention may include: (a) an automatic-imaging memberthat is worn on the person's wrist, hand, arm, or finger such that thefield of vision from this member automatically encompasses the person'smouth as the person eats; and (b) an automatic-imaging member that isworn on the person's neck, head, or torso such that the field of visionfrom this member automatically encompasses a reachable food source asthe person eats.

In other words, this device and method can comprise at least twoautomatic-imaging members that are worn on a person's body. One of theseautomatic-imaging members may be worn on a body member selected from thegroup consisting of the person's wrist, hand, lower arm, and finger,wherein the field of vision from this automatic-imaging memberautomatically encompasses the person's mouth as the person eats. Asecond of these automatic-imaging members may be worn on a body memberselected from the group consisting of the person's neck, head, torso,and upper arm, wherein the field of vision from the secondautomatic-imaging member automatically encompasses a reachable foodsource as the person eats.

In various examples, one or more automatic-imaging members may beintegrated into one or more wearable members that appear similar to awrist watch, wrist band, bracelet, arm band, necklace, pendant, brooch,collar, eyeglasses, ear ring, headband, or ear-mounted bluetooth device.In an example, this device may comprise two imaging members, or twocameras mounted on a single member, which are generally perpendicular tothe longitudinal bones of the upper arm. In an example, one of theseimaging members may have an imaging vector that points toward a foodsource at different times while food travels along the food consumptionpathway. In an example, another one of these imaging members may have animaging vector that points toward the person's mouth at different timeswhile food travels along the food consumption pathway. In an example,these different imaging vectors may occur simultaneously as food travelsalong the food consumption pathway. In another example, these differentimaging vectors may occur sequentially as food travels along the foodconsumption pathway. This device and method may provide images frommultiple imaging vectors, such that these images from multipleperspectives are automatically and collectively analyzed to identify thetypes and quantities of food consumed by the person.

In an example of this invention, multiple imaging members may be worn onthe same body member. In another example, multiple imaging members maybe worn on different body members. In an example, an imaging member maybe worn on each of a person's wrists or each of a person's hands. In anexample, one or more imaging members may be worn on a body member and asupplemental imaging member may be located in a non-wearable device thatis in proximity to the person. In an example, wearable and non-wearableimaging members may be in wireless communication with each other. In anexample, wearable and non-wearable imaging members may be in wirelesscommunication with an image-analyzing member.

In an example, a wearable imaging member may be worn on the person'sbody, a non-wearable imaging member may be positioned in proximity tothe person's body, and a tamper-resisting mechanism may ensure that boththe wearable and non-wearable imaging members are properly positioned totake pictures as the person eats. In various examples, this device andmethod may include one or more imaging members that are worn on theperson's neck, head, or torso and one or more imaging devices that arepositioned on a table, counter, or other surface in front of the personin order to simultaneously, or sequentially, take pictures of areachable food source and the person's mouth as the person eats.

In an example, this invention comprises an imaging device with multipleimaging components that take images along different imaging vectors sothat the device takes pictures of a reachable food source and a person'smouth simultaneously. In an example, this invention comprises an imagingdevice with a wide-angle lens that takes pictures within a wide field ofvision so that the device takes pictures of a reachable food source anda person's mouth simultaneously.

FIGS. 5 through 8 show additional examples of how this device and methodfor monitoring and estimating human caloric intake can be embodied.These examples are similar to the examples shown previously in that theycomprise one or more automatic-imaging members that are worn on aperson's wrist. These examples similar to the example shown in FIGS. 1and 2, except that now in FIGS. 5 through 8 there is only one camera 502located a wrist band 501.

This automatic-imaging member has features that enable the one camera,502, to take pictures of both the person's mouth and a reachable foodsource with only a single field of vision 503. In an example, thissingle wrist-mounted camera has a wide-angle lens that allows it to takepictures of the person's mouth when a piece of food is at a firstlocation along the food consumption pathway (as shown in FIG. 5) andallows it to take pictures of a reachable food source when a piece foodis at a second location along the food consumption pathway (as shown inFIG. 6).

In an example, such as that shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, a singlewrist-mounted camera is linked to a mechanism that shifts the camera'simaging vector (and field of vision) automatically as food moves alongthe food consumption pathway. This shifting imaging vector allows asingle camera to encompass a reachable food source and the person'smouth, sequentially, from different locations along the food consumptionpathway.

In the example that is shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, an accelerometer 701 isworn on the person's wrist and linked to the imaging vector of camera502. Accelerometer 701 detects arm and hand motion as food moves alongthe food consumption pathway. Information concerning this arm and handmovement is used to automatically shift the imaging vector of camera 502such that the field of vision, 503, of camera 502 sequentially capturesimages of the reachable food source and the person's mouth fromdifferent positions along the food consumption pathway. In an example,when accelerometer 701 indicates that the person's arm is in thedownward phase of the food consumption pathway (in proximity to thereachable food source) then the imaging vector of camera 502 is directedupwards to get a good picture of the person's mouth interacting withfood. Then, when accelerometer 701 indicates that the person's arm is inthe upward phase of the food consumption pathway (in proximity to theperson's mouth), the imaging vector of camera 502 is directed downwardsto get a good picture of the reachable food source.

A key advantage of this present invention for monitoring and measuring aperson's caloric intake is that it can work in an automatic and(virtually) involuntary manner. It does not require human interventioneach time that a person eats to aim a camera and push a button in orderto take the pictures necessary to estimate the types and quantities offood consumed. This is a tremendous advantage over prior art thatrequires human intervention to aim a camera (at a food source, forexample) and push a button to manually take pictures. The less humanintervention that is required to make the device work, the more accuratethe device and method will be in measuring total caloric intake. Also,the less human intervention that is required, the easier it is to makethe device and method tamper-resistant.

Ideally, one would like an automatic, involuntary, and tamper-resistantdevice and method for monitoring and measuring caloric intake—a deviceand method which not only operates independently from human interventionat the time of eating, but which can also detect and respond to possibletampering or obstruction of the imaging function. At a minimum, onewould like a device and method that does not rely on the person tomanually aim a camera and manually initiate pictures each time theperson eats. A manual device puts too much of a burden on the person tostay in compliance. At best, one would like a device and method thatdetects and responds if the person tampers with the imaging function ofthe device and method. This is critical for obtaining an accurateoverall estimate of a person's caloric intake. The device and methoddisclosed herein is a significant step toward an automatic, involuntary,and tamper-resistant device, system, and method of caloric intakemonitoring and measuring.

In an example, this device and method comprise one or moreautomatic-imaging members that automatically and collectively takepictures of a person's mouth and pictures of a reachable food source asthe person eats, without the need for human intervention to initiatepicture taking when the person starts to eat. In an example, thisinvention comprises one or more automatic-imaging members thatcollectively and automatically take pictures of the person's mouth andpictures of a reachable food source, when the person eats, without theneed for human intervention, when the person eats, to activate picturetaking by pushing a button on a camera.

In an example, one way to design a device and method to take pictureswhen a person eats without the need for human intervention is to simplyhave the device take pictures continuously. If the device is neverturned off and takes pictures all the time, then it necessarily takespictures when a person eats. In an example, such a device and methodcan: continually track the location of, and take pictures of, theperson's mouth; continually track the location of, and take pictures of,the person's hands; and continually scan for, and take pictures of, anyreachable food sources nearby.

However, having a wearable device that takes pictures all the time canraise privacy concerns. Having a device that continually takes picturesof a person's mouth and continually scans space surrounding the personfor potential food sources may be undesirable in terms of privacy,excessive energy use, or both. People may be so motivated to monitorcaloric intake and to lose weight that the benefits of a device thattakes pictures all the time may outweigh privacy concerns. Accordingly,this invention may be embodied in a device and method that takespictures all the time. However, for those for whom such privacy concernsare significant, we now consider some alternative approaches forautomating picture taking when a person eats.

In an example, an alternative approach to having imaging members takepictures automatically when a person eats, without the need for humanintervention, is to have the imaging members start taking pictures onlywhen sensors indicate that the person is probably eating. This canreduce privacy concerns as compared to a device and method that takespictures all the time. In an example, an imaging device and method canautomatically begin taking images when wearable sensors indicate thatthe person is probably consuming food.

In an example of this alternative approach, this device and method maytake pictures of the person's mouth and scan for a reachable food sourceonly when a wearable sensor, such as the accelerometer 701 in FIGS. 7and 8, indicates that the person is (probably) eating. In variousexamples, one or more sensors that detect when the person is (probably)eating can be selected from the group consisting of: accelerometer,inclinometer, motion sensor, sound sensor, smell sensor, blood pressuresensor, heart rate sensor, EEG sensor, ECG sensor, EMG sensor,electrochemical sensor, gastric activity sensor, GPS sensor, locationsensor, image sensor, optical sensor, piezoelectric sensor, respirationsensor, strain gauge, electrogoniometer, chewing sensor, swallow sensor,temperature sensor, and pressure sensor.

In various examples, indications that a person is probably eating may beselected from the group consisting of: acceleration, inclination,twisting, or rolling of the person's hand, wrist, or arm; accelerationor inclination of the person's lower arm or upper arm; bending of theperson's shoulder, elbow, wrist, or finger joints; movement of theperson's jaw, such as bending of the jaw joint; smells suggesting foodthat are detected by an artificial olfactory sensor; detection ofchewing, swallowing, or other eating sounds by one or more microphones;electromagnetic waves from the person's stomach, heart, brain, or otherorgans; GPS or other location-based indications that a person is in aneating establishment (such as a restaurant) or food source location(such as a kitchen).

In previous paragraphs, we discussed how this present invention issuperior to prior art because this present invention does not requiremanual activation of picture taking each time that a person eats. Thispresent invention takes pictures automatically when a person eats. Wenow discuss how this present invention is also superior to prior artbecause this present invention does not require manual aiming of acamera (or other imaging device) toward the person's mouth or areachable food source each time that a person eats.

In an example, this device and method comprise one or moreautomatic-imaging members that automatically and collectively takepictures of a person's mouth and pictures of a reachable food source asthe person eats, without the need for human intervention to actively aimor focus a camera toward a person's mouth or a reachable food source. Inan example, this device and method takes pictures of a person's mouthand a food source automatically by eliminating the need for humanintervention to aim an imaging member, such as a camera, towards theperson's mouth and the food source. This device and method includesimaging members whose locations, and/or the movement of those locationswhile the person eats, enables the fields of vision of the imagingmembers to automatically encompass the person's mouth and a food source.

In an example, the fields of vision from one or more automatic-imagingmembers in this invention can collectively and automatically encompassthe person's mouth and a reachable food source, when the person eats,without the need for human intervention (when the person eats) tomanually aim an imaging member toward the person's mouth or toward thereachable food source. In an example, the automatic-imaging members havewide-angle lenses that encompass a reachable food source and theperson's mouth without any need for aiming or moving the imagingmembers. Alternatively, an automatic-imaging member may sequentially anditeratively focus on the food source, then on the person's mouth, thenback on the food source, and so forth.

In an example, this device can automatically adjust the imaging vectorsor focal lengths of one or more imaging components so that these imagingcomponents stay focused on a food source and/or the person's mouth. Evenif the line of sight from an automatic-imaging member to a food source,or to the person's mouth, becomes temporarily obscured, the device cantrack the last-known location of the food source, or the person's mouth,and search near that location in space to re-identify the food source,or mouth, to re-establish imaging contact. In an example, the device maytrack movement of the food source, or the person's mouth, relative tothe imaging device. In an example, the device may extrapolate expectedmovement of the food source, or the person's mouth, and search in theexpected projected of the food source, or the person's mouth, in orderto re-establish imaging contact. In various examples, this device andmethod may use face recognition and/or gesture recognition methods totrack the location of the person's face and/or hand relative to awearable imaging device.

In an example, this device and method comprise at least one camera (orother imaging member) that takes pictures along an imaging vector whichpoints toward the person's mouth and/or face, during certain bodyconfigurations, while the person eats. In an example, this device andmember uses face recognition methods to adjust the direction and/orfocal length of its field of vision in order to stay focused on theperson's mouth and/or face. Face recognition methods and/or gesturerecognition methods may also be used to detect and measure hand-to-mouthproximity and interaction. In an example, one or more imaging devicesautomatically stay focused on the person's mouth, even if the devicemoves, by the use of face recognition methods. In an example, the fieldsof vision from one or more automatic-imaging members collectivelyencompass the person's mouth and a reachable food source, when theperson eats, without the need for human intervention, when the personeats, because the imaging members remain automatically directed towardthe person's mouth, toward the reachable food source, or both.

In various examples, movement of one or more automatic-imaging membersallows their fields of vision to automatically and collectively captureimages of the person's mouth and a reachable food source without theneed for human intervention when the person eats. In an example, thisdevice and method includes an automatic-imaging member that is worn onthe person's wrist, hand, finger, or arm, such that thisautomatic-imaging member automatically takes pictures of the person'smouth, a reachable food source, or both as the person moves their armand hand when they eat. This movement causes the fields of vision fromone or more automatic-imaging members to collectively and automaticallyencompass the person's mouth and a reachable food source as the personeats. Accordingly, there is no need for human intervention, when theperson starts eating, to manually aim a camera (or other imaging member)toward the person's mouth or toward a reachable food source. Picturetaking of the person's mouth and the food source is automatic andvirtually involuntary. This makes it relatively easy to incorporatetamper-resisting features into this invention.

In an example, one or more imaging members are worn on a body memberthat moves as food travels along the food consumption pathway. In thismanner, these one or more imaging members have lines of sight to theperson's mouth and to the food source during at least some points alongthe food consumption pathway. In various examples, this movement iscaused by bending of the person's shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints. Inan example, an imaging member is worn on the wrist, arm, or hand of adominant arm, wherein the person uses this arm to move food along thefood consumption pathway. In another example, an imaging member may beworn on the wrist, arm, or hand of a non-dominant arm, wherein thisother arm is generally stationery and not used to move food along thefood consumption pathway. In another example, automatic-imaging membersmay be worn on both arms.

In an example, this invention comprises two or more automatic-imagingmembers wherein a first imaging member is pointed toward the person'smouth most of the time, as the person moves their arm to move food alongthe food consumption pathway, and wherein a second imaging member ispointed toward a reachable food source most of the time, as the personmoves their arm to move food along the food consumption pathway. In anexample, this invention comprises one or more imaging members wherein: afirst imaging member points toward the person's mouth at least once asthe person brings a piece (or portion) of food to their mouth from areachable food source; and a second imaging member points toward thereachable food source at least once as the person brings a piece (orportion) of food to their mouth from the reachable food source.

In an example, this device and method comprise an imaging device with asingle imaging member that takes pictures along shifting imagingvectors, as food travels along the food consumption pathway, so that ittake pictures of a food source and the person's mouth sequentially. Inan example, this device and method takes pictures of a food source and aperson's mouth from different positions as food moves along the foodconsumption pathway. In an example, this device and method comprise animaging device that scans for, locates, and takes pictures of the distaland proximal endpoints of the food consumption pathway.

In an example of this invention, the fields of vision from one or moreautomatic-imaging members are shifted by movement of the person's armand hand while the person eats. This shifting causes the fields ofvision from the one or more automatic-imaging members to collectivelyand automatically encompass the person's mouth and a reachable foodsource while the person is eating. This encompassing imaging occurswithout the need for human intervention when the person eats. Thiseliminates the need for a person to manually aim a camera (or otherimaging member) toward their mouth or toward a reachable food source.

FIGS. 9-14 again show the example of that was introduced in FIGS. 1-2.However, this example is now shown as functioning in a six-picturesequence of food consumption, involving multiple cycles of pieces (orportions) of food moving along the food consumption pathway until thefood source is entirely consumed. In FIGS. 9-14, this device and methodare shown taking pictures of a reachable food source and the person'smouth, from multiple perspectives, as the person eats until all of thefood on a plate is consumed.

FIG. 9 starts this sequence by showing a person 101 engaging food 106 onplate 105 with utensil 107. The person moves utensil 107 by moving theirarm 102 and hand 103. Wrist-mounted camera 109, on wrist band 108, has afield of vision 111 that encompasses the person's mouth. Wrist-mountedcamera 110, also on wrist band 108, has a field of vision 112 thatpartially encompasses a reachable food source which, in this example, isfood 106 on plate 105 on table 104.

FIG. 10 continues this sequence by showing the person having bent theirarm 102 and wrist 103 in order to move a piece of food up to their mouthvia utensil 107. In FIG. 10, camera 109 has a field of vision 111 thatencompasses the person's mouth (including the interaction of theperson's mouth and the piece of food) and camera 110 has a field ofvision 112 that now fully encompasses the food source.

FIGS. 11-14 continue this sequence with additional cycles of the foodconsumption pathway, wherein the person brings pieces of food from theplate 105 to the person's mouth. In this example, by the end of thissequence shown in FIG. 14 the person has eaten all of the food 106 fromplate 105.

In the sequence of food consumption pathway cycles that is shown inFIGS. 9-14, pictures of the reachable food source (food 106 on plate105) taken by camera 110 are particularly useful in identifying thetypes of food to which the person has reachable access. In this simpleexample, featuring a single person with a single plate, changes in thevolume of food on the plate could also be used to estimate thequantities of food which this person consumes. However, with morecomplex situations featuring multiple people and multiple food sources,images of the food source only would be limited for estimating thequantity of food that is actually consumed by a given person.

In this example, the pictures of the person's mouth taken by camera 109are particularly useful for estimating the quantities of food actuallyconsumed by the person. Static or moving pictures of the personinserting pieces of food into their mouth, refined by counting thenumber or speed of chewing motions and the number of cycles of the foodconsumption pathway, can be used to estimate the quantity of foodconsumed. However, images of the mouth only would be limited foridentifying the types of food consumed.

Integrated analysis of pictures of both the food source and the person'smouth can provide a relatively accurate estimate of the types andquantities of food actually consumed by this person, even in situationswith multiple food sources and multiple diners. Integrated analysis cancompare estimates of food quantity consumed based on changes in observedfood volume at the food source to estimates of food quantity consumedbased on mouth-food interaction and food consumption pathway cycles.

Although it is preferable that the field of vision 111 for camera 109encompasses the person's mouth all the time and that the field of vision111 for camera 110 encompasses the reachable food source all the time,integrated analysis can occur even if this is not possible. As long asthe field of vision 112 for camera 110 encompasses the food source atleast once during a food consumption pathway cycle and the field ofvision 111 from camera 109 encompasses the person's mouth at least onceduring a food consumption pathway cycle, this device and method canextrapolate mouth-food interaction and also changes in food volume atthe reachable food source.

FIGS. 15 and 16 show, in greater detail, how the field of vision from awrist-worn imaging member can advantageously shift as a person moves androlls their wrist to bring food up to their mouth along the foodconsumption pathway. These figures show a person's hand 103 holdingutensil 107 from the perspective of a person looking at their hand, astheir hand brings the utensil up to their mouth. This rolling andshifting motion can enable a single imaging member, such as a singlecamera 1502 mounted on wrist band 1501, to take pictures of a reachablefood source and the person's mouth, from different points along the foodconsumption pathway.

FIGS. 15 and 16 show movement of a single camera 1502 mounted on theanterior (inside) surface of wrist band 1501 as the person moves androlls their wrist to bring utensil 107 up from a food source to theirmouth. The manner in which this camera is worn is like a wrist watch,with a camera instead of a watch face, which has been rotated 180degrees around the person's wrist. In FIG. 15, field of vision 1503 fromcamera 1502 points generally downward in a manner that would be likelyto encompass a reachable food source which the person would engage withutensil 107. In FIG. 16, this field of vision 1503 has been rotatedupwards towards the person's mouth by the rotation of the person's wristas the person brings utensil 107 up to their mouth. These two figuresillustrate an example wherein a single wrist-worn imaging member cantake pictures of both a reachable food source and the person's mouth,due to the rolling motion of a person's wrist as food is moved along thefood consumption pathway.

FIGS. 17 and 18 are similar to FIGS. 15 and 16, except that FIGS. 17 and18 show a wrist-worn automatic-imaging member with two cameras, 1702 and1801, instead of just one. This is similar to the example introduced inFIGS. 1 and 2. These figures show the person's hand 103 holding utensil107 from the perspective of a person looking at their hand, as theirhand brings the utensil up to their mouth. FIGS. 17 and 18 show how therolling motion of the wrist, as food is moved along the food consumptionpathway, enables a wrist-worn imaging member with two cameras, 1702 and1801, to collectively and automatically take pictures of a reachablefood source and a person's mouth.

The two cameras in FIGS. 17 and 18 are attached to the narrow sides ofthe person's wrist via wrist band 1701. Camera 1801 is not shown in FIG.17 because it is on the far-side of the person's wrist which is notvisible in FIG. 17. After the person's rolls their wrist to bring theutensil up toward their mouth, as shown in FIG. 18, camera 1801 comesinto view. This rolling and shifting motion of the person's wrist,occurring between FIGS. 17 and 18, enables the two cameras, 1702 and1801, to automatically and collectively take pictures of a reachablefood source and the person's mouth, from different points along the foodconsumption pathway. In FIG. 17, field of vision 1703 from camera 1702is directed toward the person's mouth. In FIG. 18, after the person hasmoved their arm and rotated their wrist, field of vision 1802 fromcamera 1801 is directed toward (the likely location of) a reachable foodsource. In an example, camera 1801 may scan the vicinity in order todetect and identify a reachable food source.

Having two cameras mounted on opposite sides of a person's wristincreases the probability of encompassing both the person's mouth and areachable food source as the person rolls their wrist and bends theirarm to move food along the food consumption pathway. In other examples,more than two cameras may be attached on a band around the person'swrist to further increase the probability of encompassing both theperson's mouth and the reachable food source.

In an example, the location of one or more cameras may be movedautomatically, independently of movement of the body member to which thecameras are attached, in order to increase the probability ofencompassing both the person's mouth and a reachable food source. In anexample, the lenses of one or more cameras may be automatically andindependently moved in order to increase the probability of encompassingboth the person's mouth and a reachable food source. In variousexamples, a lens may be automatically shifted or rotated to change thedirection or focal length of the camera's field of vision. In anexample, the lenses of one or more cameras may be automatically moved totrack the person's mouth and hand. In an example, the lenses of one ormore cameras may be automatically moved to scan for reachable foodsources.

In an example, this device and method comprise a device that is worn ona person so as to take images of food, or pieces of food, at multiplelocations as food travels along a food consumption pathway. In anexample, this device and method comprise a device that takes a series ofpictures of a portion of food as it moves along a food consumptionpathway between a reachable food source and the person's mouth. In anexample, this device and method comprise a wearable imaging member thattakes pictures upwards toward a person's face as the person's arm bendswhen the person eats. In an example, this invention comprises an imagingmember that captures images of the person's mouth when the person'selbow is bent at an angle between 40-140 degrees as the person bringsfood to their mouth. In various examples, this device and methodautomatically takes pictures of food at a plurality of positions as foodmoves along the food consumption pathway. In an example, this device andmethod estimates the type and quantity of food consumed based, at leastpartially, on pattern analysis of images of the proximal and distalendpoints of the food consumption pathway.

In an example, this invention comprises a human-energy input measuringdevice and method that includes a wearable imaging member thatidentifies the types and quantities of food consumed based on images offood from a plurality of points along a food consumption pathway. In anexample, this device and method takes pictures of a person's mouth and areachable food source from multiple angles, from an imaging member wornon a body member that moves as food travels along the food consumptionpathway.

In an example, this invention comprises one or more of imaging deviceswhich are worn on a location on the human body that provides at leastone line of sight from the device to the person's mouth and at least oneline of sight to a reachable food source, as food travels along the foodconsumption pathway. In various examples, these one or more imagingdevices simultaneously or sequentially record images along at least twodifferent vectors, one which points toward the mouth during at leastsome portion of the food consumption pathway and one which points towardthe food source during at least some portion of the food consumptionpathway. In various examples, this device and method comprise multipleimaging members that are worn on a person's wrist, hand, arm, orfinger—with some imaging elements pointed toward the person's mouth fromcertain locations along the food consumption pathway and some imagingelements pointed toward a reachable food source from certain locationsalong the food consumption pathway.

This invention can comprise a device and method that includes at leastone image-analyzing member. This image-analyzing member automaticallyanalyzes pictures of a person's mouth and pictures of a reachable foodsource in order to estimate the types and quantities of food consumed bythis person. This is superior to prior art that only analyzes picturesof a reachable food source because the person might not actually consumeall of the food at this food source.

In various examples, one or more methods to analyze pictures, in orderto estimate the types and quantities of food consumed, can be selectedfrom the group consisting of: pattern recognition; food recognition;word recognition; logo recognition; bar code recognition; facerecognition; gesture recognition; and human motion recognition. Invarious examples, a picture of the person's mouth and/or a reachablefood source may be analyzed with one or more methods selected from thegroup consisting of: pattern recognition or identification; human motionrecognition or identification; face recognition or identification;gesture recognition or identification; food recognition oridentification; word recognition or identification; logo recognition oridentification; bar code recognition or identification; and 3D modeling.In an example, images of a person's mouth and a reachable food sourcemay be taken from at least two different perspectives in order to enablethe creation of three-dimensional models of food.

In various examples, this invention comprises one or moreimage-analyzing members that analyze one or more factors selected fromthe group consisting of: number and type of reachable food sources;changes in the volume of food observed at a reachable food source;number and size of chewing movements; number and size of swallowingmovements; number of times that pieces (or portions) of food travelalong the food consumption pathway; and size of pieces (or portions) offood traveling along the food consumption pathway. In various examples,one or more of these factors may be used to analyze images to estimatethe types and quantities of food consumed by a person.

In an example, this invention is entirely automatic for both foodimaging and food identification. In an example, this invention comprisesa device and method that automatically and comprehensively analyzesimages of food sources and a person's mouth in order to provide finalestimates of the types and quantities of food consumed. In an example,the food identification and quantification process performed by thisdevice and method does not require any manual entry of information, anymanual initiation of picture taking, or any manual aiming of an imagingdevice when a person eats. In an example, this device and methodautomatically analyzes images to estimate the types and quantities offood consumed without the need for real-time or subsequent humanevaluation.

In an example, this device identifies the types and quantities of foodconsumed based on: pattern recognition of food at a reachable foodsource; changes in food at that source; analysis of images of foodtraveling along a food consumption pathway from a food source to theperson's mouth; and/or the number of cycles of food moving along thefood consumption pathway. In various examples, food may be identified bypattern recognition of food itself, by recognition of words on foodpackaging or containers, by recognition of food brand images and logos,or by recognition of product identification codes (such as “bar codes”).In an example, analysis of images by this device and method occurs inreal time, as the person is consuming food. In an example, analysis ofimages by this device and method occurs after the person has consumedfood.

In another example, this invention is partially automatic and partiallyrefined by human evaluation or interaction. In an example, this deviceand method comprise a device and method that automatically analyzesimages of food sources and a person's mouth in order to provide initialestimates of the types and quantities of food consumed. These initialestimates are then refined by human evaluation and/or interaction. In anexample, estimation of the types and quantities of food consumed isrefined or enhanced by human interaction and/or evaluation.

For example, the device may prompt the person with clarifying questionsconcerning the types and quantities of food that person has consumed.These questions may be asked in real time, as a person eats, at asubsequent time, or periodically. In an example, this device and methodmay prompt the person with queries to refine initialautomatically-generated estimates of the types and quantities of foodconsumed. Automatic estimates may be refined by interaction between thedevice and the person. However, such refinement should have limits andsafeguards to guard against possible tampering. For example, the deviceand method should not allow a person to modify automatically-generatedinitial estimates of food consumed to a degree that would cause thedevice and method to under-estimate caloric intake.

In an example, analysis of food images and estimation of food consumedby this device and method may be entirely automatic or may be a mixtureof automated estimates plus human refinement. Even a partially-automateddevice and method for calorie monitoring and estimation is superior toprior art that relies completely on manual calorie counting or manualentry of food items consumed. In an example, the estimates of the typesand quantities of food consumed that are produced by this invention areused to estimate human caloric intake. In an example, images of aperson's mouth, a reachable food source, and the interaction between theperson's mouth and food are automatically, or semi-automatically,analyzed to estimate the types of quantities of food that the personeats. These estimates are, in turn, used to estimate the person'scaloric intake.

In an example, the caloric intake estimation provided by this device andmethod becomes the energy-input measuring component of an overall systemfor energy balance and weight management. In an example, the device andmethod can estimate the energy-input component of energy balance. In anexample, this invention comprises an automatic and tamper-resistantdevice and method for estimating human caloric intake.

In an example, the device and method for estimating human caloric intakethat is disclosed herein may be used in conjunction with a device andmethod for estimating human caloric output and/or human energyexpenditure. In an example, this present invention can be used incombination with a wearable and mobile energy-output-measuring componentthat automatically records and analyses images in order to detectactivity and energy expenditure. In an example, this present inventionmay be used in combination with a wearable and mobile device thatestimates human energy output based on patterns of acceleration andmovement of body members. In an example, this invention may be used incombination with an energy-output-measuring component that estimatesenergy output by measuring changes in the position and configuration ofa person's body.

In an example, this invention may be incorporated into an overalldevice, system, and method for human energy balance and weightmanagement. In an example, the estimates of the types and quantities offood consumed that are provided by this present invention are used toestimate human caloric intake. These estimates of human caloric intakeare then, in turn, used in combination with estimates of human caloricexpenditure as part of an overall system for human energy balance andweight management. In an example, estimates of the types and quantitiesof food consumed are used to estimate human caloric intake and whereinthese estimates of human caloric intake are used in combination withestimates of human caloric expenditure as part of an overall system forhuman energy balance and human weight management.

This invention can include an optional analytic component that analyzesand compares human caloric input vs. human caloric output for aparticular person as part of an overall device, system, and method foroverall energy balance and weight management. This overall device,system, and method may be used to help a person to lose weight or tomaintain a desirable weight. In an example, this device and method canbe used as part of a system with a human-energy input measuringcomponent and a human-energy output measuring component. In an example,this invention is part of an overall system for energy balance andweight management.

Thus far in our description of the figures, we have repeatedly describedexamples as being tamper resistant, but have not shown details of howtamper-resistant features could be embodied. We now show and discuss, insome detail, some of the specific ways in which this device and methodfor monitoring and measuring caloric intake can be made tamperresistant. This invention advantageously can be made tamper-resistantbecause the imaging members are wearable and can operate in an automaticmanner.

In an example, this invention includes one or more automatic-imagingmembers that collectively and automatically take pictures of theperson's mouth and pictures of a reachable food source, when the personeats, without the need for human intervention, when the person eats, toactivate picture taking. In an example, these one or moreautomatic-imaging members take pictures continually. In an example,these one or more automatic-imaging members are automatically activatedto take pictures when a person eats based on a sensor selected from thegroup consisting of: accelerometer, inclinometer, motion sensor, soundsensor, smell sensor, blood pressure sensor, heart rate sensor, EEGsensor, ECG sensor, EMG sensor, electrochemical sensor, gastric activitysensor, GPS sensor, location sensor, image sensor, optical sensor,piezoelectric sensor, respiration sensor, strain gauge,electrogoniometer, chewing sensor, swallow sensor, temperature sensor,and pressure sensor.

In an example, the fields of vision from these one or moreautomatic-imaging members collectively and automatically encompass theperson's mouth and a reachable food source, when the person eats,without the need for human intervention, when the person eats, tomanually aim an imaging member toward the person's mouth or toward thereachable food source. In an example, the fields of vision from one ormore automatic-imaging members are moved as the person moves their armwhen the person eats; and wherein this movement causes the fields ofvision from one or more automatic-imaging members to collectively andautomatically encompass the person's mouth and a reachable food source,when the person eats, without the need for human intervention, when theperson eats, to manually aim an imaging member toward the person's mouthor toward the reachable food source.

In an example, these one or more automatic-imaging members are worn onone or more body members selected from the group consisting of theperson's wrist, hand, arm, and finger; wherein the fields of vision fromone or more automatic-imaging members are moved as the person movestheir arm when the person eats; and wherein this movement causes thefields of vision from one or more automatic-imaging members tocollectively and automatically encompass the person's mouth and areachable food source, when the person eats, without the need for humanintervention, when the person eats, to manually aim an imaging membertoward the person's mouth or toward the reachable food source.

FIGS. 19-21 show one example of how a device can be made tamperresistant. FIGS. 19-21 show a person, 1901, who can access a reachablefood source 1905 (food in a bowl, in this example), on table 1906, bymoving their arm 1903 and hand 1904. In this example, the person 1901 iswearing a wrist-based automatic-imaging member 1907 with field of vision1908. In FIG. 19, this wrist-based automatic-imaging member 1907 isfunctioning properly because the field of vision 1908 from of thisautomatic-imaging member 1907 has an unobstructed line of sight to theperson's mouth 1902. This imaging member can monitor the person's mouth1902 to detect if the person is eating and then analyze pictures toestimate the quantity of food consumed.

In FIG. 19, automatic-imaging member 1907 recognizes that the line ofsight to the person's mouth is unobstructed because it recognizes theperson's mouth using face recognition methods. In other examples,automatic-imaging member 1907 may recognize that the line of sight tothe person's mouth is unobstructed by using other pattern recognition orimaging-analyzing means. As long as a line of sight from theautomatic-imaging member to the person's mouth is maintained(unobstructed), the device and method can detect if the person startseating and, in conjunction with images of the reachable food source, itcan estimate caloric intake based on quantities and types of foodconsumed.

In FIG. 20, person 1901 has bent their arm 1903 and moved their hand1904 in order to bring a piece of food from the reachable food source1905 up to their mouth 1902. In this example, the piece of food isclutched (hidden) in the person's hand as it travels along the foodconsumption pathway. In this example, the automatic-imaging member 1907used face recognition methods to track the relative location of theperson's mouth 1902 and has shifted its field of vision 1908 in order tomaintain the line of sight to the person's mouth. As long as this lineof sight is maintained, this mouth-imaging component of this device andmethod for estimating caloric intake can function properly.

In FIG. 21, however, the functioning of this imaging member 1907 hasbeen impaired. This impairment may be intentional tampering by theperson or it may be accidental. In either event, the device and methoddetects and responds to the impairment in order to correct theimpairment. In FIG. 21, the sleeve of the person's shirt has slippeddown over the automatic-imaging device, obstructing the line of sightfrom the imaging device 1907 to the person's mouth 1902. Thus covered,the obstructed automatic-imaging member cannot function properly. Inthis example, the automatic-imaging member recognizes that its line ofsight to the person's mouth has been lost. In an example, it mayrecognize this by using face recognition methods. When the person's faceis no longer found at an expected location (or nearby), then the deviceand method recognizes that its functioning is impaired.

Without a line of sight to the person's mouth in FIG. 21, the wrist-wornautomatic-imaging device 1907 no longer works properly to monitor andestimate caloric intake. In response, automatic-imaging device 1907gives a response 2101 that is represented in FIG. 21 by a lightning boltsymbol. In an example, this response 2101 may be an electronic buzzingsound or a ring tone. In another example, response 2101 may includevibration of the person's wrist. In another example, response 2101 maybe transmission or a message to a remote location or monitor. In variousexamples, this invention detects and responds to loss of imagingfunctionality in a manner that helps to restore proper imagingfunctionality. In this example, response 2101 prompts the person to movetheir shirt sleeve upwards to uncover the wrist-worn imaging member 1904so that this imaging member can work properly once again.

In an example, the line of sight from an automatic-imaging member to theperson's mouth may be obstructed by an accidental event, such as theaccidental downward sliding of the person's shirt sleeve. In anotherexample, the line of sight from the automatic-imaging member to theperson's mouth may be intentionally obstructed by the person.Technically, only the second type of causation should be called“tampering” with the operation of the device and method. However, onecan design tamper-resisting features for operation of the device andmethod that detect and correct operational impairment whether thisimpairment is accidental or intentional. The device can be designed todetect if the automatic-imaging function is obstructed, or otherwiseimpaired, and to respond accordingly to restore functionality.

One example of a tamper-resistant design is for the device to constantlymonitor the location of the person's mouth and to respond if a line ofsight to the person's mouth is ever obstructed. Another example of atamper-resistant design is for the device to constantly scan and monitorspace around the person, especially space in the vicinity of theperson's hand, to detect possible reachable food sources. In a variationon these examples, a device may only monitor the location of theperson's mouth, or scan for possible reachable food sources, when one ormore sensors indicate that the person is probably eating. These one ormore sensors may be selected from the group consisting of:accelerometer, inclinometer, motion sensor, pedometer, sound sensor,smell sensor, blood pressure sensor, heart rate sensor, EEG sensor, ECGsensor, EMG sensor, electrochemical sensor, gastric activity sensor, GPSsensor, location sensor, image sensor, optical sensor, piezoelectricsensor, respiration sensor, strain gauge, electrogoniometer, chewingsensor, swallow sensor, temperature sensor, and pressure sensor.

In an example, this invention can be embodied in a tamper-resistantdevice that automatically monitors caloric intake comprising: one ormore automatic-imaging members that are worn on one or more locations ona person from which these members: collectively and automatically takepictures of the person's mouth when the person eats and pictures of areachable food source when the person eats; wherein a reachable foodsource is a food source that the person can reach by moving their arm;and wherein food can include liquid nourishment as well as solid food; atamper-resisting mechanism which detects and responds if the operationof the one or more automatic-imaging members is impaired; and animage-analyzing member which automatically analyzes pictures of theperson's mouth and pictures of the reachable food source in order toestimate the types and quantities of food that are consumed by theperson.

FIG. 22 shows another example of how a device may be embodied atamper-resisting device and method to automatically monitor and measurecaloric intake. In FIG. 22, this device and method comprise two wearableautomatic-imaging members. The first automatic-imaging member, 1907, isworn on a person's wrist like a wrist watch. This first member takespictures of the person's mouth and detects if the line of sight fromthis first imaging member to the person's mouth is obstructed orotherwise impaired. The second automatic-imaging member, 2201, is wornon a person's neck like a necklace. This second member takes pictures ofthe person's hand and a reachable food source and detects if the line ofsight from the second imaging member to the person's hand and areachable food source is obstructed or otherwise impaired. In thisexample, this device and method is tamper-resistant because it detectsand responds if either of these lines of sight are obstructed orotherwise impaired.

Discussing FIG. 22 in further detail, this figure shows person 1901accessing reachable food source (e.g. a bowl of food) 1905 on table 1906by moving their arm 1903 and hand 1904. Person 1901 wears a firstautomatic-imaging member 1907 around their wrist. From its wrist-wornlocation, this first imaging member 1907 has a field of vision 1908 thatencompasses the person's mouth 1902. In an example, thisautomatic-imaging member 1907 uses face recognition to shift its fieldof vision 1907, as the person moves their wrist or head, so as tomaintain a line of sight from the wrist to the person's mouth. In anexample, the field of vision 1907 may be shifted by automatic rotationor shifting of the lens on automatic-imaging member 1907.

In an example, first automatic-imaging member 1907 constantly maintainsa line of sight to the person's mouth by constantly shifting thedirection and/or focal length of its field of vision 1908. In anotherexample, this first automatic-imaging member 1907 scans and acquires aline of sight to the person's mouth only when a sensor indicates thatthe person is eating. In an example, this scanning function may comprisechanging the direction and/or focal length of the member's field ofvision 1908. If the line of sight from this member to the person's mouthis obstructed, or otherwise impaired, then this device and methoddetects and responds to this impairment as part of its tamper-resistingfunction. In an example, its response to tampering helps to restoreproper imaging function for automatic monitoring and estimation ofcaloric intake.

In this example, this person 1901 also wears a second automatic-imagingmember 2201 around their neck. In this example, automatic-imaging member2201 is worn like a central pendant on the front of a necklace. Fromthis location, this second imaging member has a forward-and-downwardfacing field of vision, 2202, that encompasses the person's hand 1904and a reachable food source 1905. In an example, this secondautomatic-imaging member 2201 uses gesture recognition, or other patternrecognition methods, to shift its focus so as to always maintain a lineof sight to the person's hand and/or to scan for potential reachablefood sources.

In an example, this second automatic-imaging member 2201 constantlymaintains a line of sight to one or both of the person's hands. Inanother example, this second automatic-imaging member 2201 scans for(and identifies and maintains a line of sight to) the person's hand onlywhen a sensor indicates that the person is eating. In another example,this second automatic-imaging member 2201 scans for, acquires, andmaintains a line of sight to a reachable food source only when a sensorindicates that the person is probably eating. In various examples, thesensors used to activate one or more of these automatic-imaging membersmay be selected from the group consisting of: accelerometer,inclinometer, motion sensor, pedometer, sound sensor, smell sensor,blood pressure sensor, heart rate sensor, EEG sensor, ECG sensor, EMGsensor, electrochemical sensor, gastric activity sensor, GPS sensor,location sensor, image sensor, optical sensor, piezoelectric sensor,respiration sensor, strain gauge, electrogoniometer, chewing sensor,swallow sensor, temperature sensor, and pressure sensor.

In an example, this device and method comprise one or more imagingmembers that scan nearby space in order to identify a person's mouth,hand, and/or reachable food source in response to sensors indicatingthat the person is probably eating. In an example, one of these imagingmembers: (a) scans space surrounding the imaging member in order toidentify the person's hand and acquire a line of sight to the person'shand when a sensor indicates that the person is eating; and then (b)scans space surrounding the person's hand in order to identify andacquire a line of sight to any reachable food source near the person'shand. In an example, the device and method may concentrate scanningefforts on the person's hand at the distal endpoint of a foodconsumption pathway to detect and identify a reachable food source. Ifthe line of sight from this imaging member to the person's hand and/or areachable food source is subsequently obstructed or otherwise impaired,then this device and method detects and responds as part of itstamper-resisting features. In an example, this response is designed torestore imaging functionality to enable proper automatic monitoring andestimation of caloric intake.

More generally, in various examples, a device can include one or moretamper-resisting mechanisms which detect and respond if the operation ofone or more automatic-imaging members are obstructed or otherwiseimpaired. In an example, a device can include a tamper-resistingmechanism which detects and responds if a person hinders the operationof one or more automatic-imaging members. For example, the device andmethod disclosed herein can have a tamper-resistant feature that istriggered if the device is removed from the body member as indicated bya sensor selected from the group consisting of: accelerometer,inclinometer, motion sensor, pedometer, sound sensor, smell sensor,blood pressure sensor, heart rate sensor, EEG sensor, ECG sensor, EMGsensor, electrochemical sensor, gastric activity sensor, GPS sensor,location sensor, image sensor, optical sensor, piezoelectric sensor,respiration sensor, strain gauge, electrogoniometer, chewing sensor,swallow sensor, temperature sensor, and pressure sensor.

In an example, this invention comprises a device and method withfeatures that resist tampering with the automatic and involuntaryestimation of the types and quantities of food consumed by a person. Inan example, this device and method includes an alarm that is triggeredif a wearable imaging device is covered up. In various examples, thisinvention comprises one or more imaging devices which detect and respondif their direct line of sight with the person's mouth or a reachablefood source is impaired. In an example, this invention includes atamper-resisting member that monitors a person's mouth using facerecognition methods and responds if the line of sight from anautomatic-imaging member to the person's mouth is impaired when a personeats. In another example, this invention includes a tamper-resistingmember that detects and responds if the person's actual weight gain orloss is inconsistent with predicted weight gain or loss. Weight gain orloss may be predicted by the net balance of estimated caloric intake andestimated caloric expenditure.

The tamper-resisting features of this invention help to make theoperation of this invention relatively automatic, tamper-resistant, andvirtually involuntary. This ensures comprehensive and accuratemonitoring and measuring of caloric intake.

In an example, this invention can include at least two automatic-imagingmembers worn on a person's body, wherein the field of vision from afirst automatic-imaging member automatically encompasses the person'smouth as the person eats, and wherein the field of vision from a secondautomatic-imaging member automatically encompasses a reachable foodsource as the person eats.

In an example, this invention can include at least two automatic-imagingmembers worn on a person's body: wherein a first automatic-imagingmember is worn on a body member selected from the group consisting ofthe person's wrist, hand, lower arm, and finger; wherein the field ofvision from the first automatic-imaging member automatically encompassesthe person's mouth as the person eats; wherein a secondautomatic-imaging member is worn on a body member selected from thegroup consisting of the person's neck, head, torso, and upper arm; andwherein the field of vision from the second automatic-imaging memberautomatically encompasses a reachable food source as the person eats.

In an example, this invention can include a tamper-resisting member thatcomprises a sensor that detects and responds if an automatic-imagingmember is removed from the person's body, wherein this sensor isselected from the group consisting of: accelerometer, inclinometer,motion sensor, pedometer, sound sensor, smell sensor, blood pressuresensor, heart rate sensor, EEG sensor, ECG sensor, EMG sensor,electrochemical sensor, gastric activity sensor, GPS sensor, locationsensor, image sensor, optical sensor, piezoelectric sensor, respirationsensor, strain gauge, electrogoniometer, chewing sensor, swallow sensor,temperature sensor, and pressure sensor.

In an example, this invention can include a tamper-resisting member thatcomprises a sensor that detects and responds if the line of sight fromone or more automatic-imaging members to the person's mouth or to a foodsource is impaired when a person is probably eating based on a sensor,wherein this sensor is selected from the group consisting of:accelerometer, inclinometer, motion sensor, pedometer, sound sensor,smell sensor, blood pressure sensor, heart rate sensor, EEG sensor, ECGsensor, EMG sensor, electrochemical sensor, gastric activity sensor, GPSsensor, location sensor, image sensor, optical sensor, piezoelectricsensor, respiration sensor, strain gauge, electrogoniometer, chewingsensor, swallow sensor, temperature sensor, and pressure sensor.

In an example, this invention can include a tamper-resisting member thatmonitors a person's mouth using face recognition methods and responds ifthe line of sight from an automatic-imaging member to the person's mouthis impaired when a person is probably eating based on a sensor, whereinthis sensor is selected from the group consisting of: accelerometer,inclinometer, motion sensor, pedometer, sound sensor, smell sensor,blood pressure sensor, heart rate sensor, EEG sensor, ECG sensor, EMGsensor, electrochemical sensor, gastric activity sensor, GPS sensor,location sensor, image sensor, optical sensor, piezoelectric sensor,respiration sensor, strain gauge, electrogoniometer, chewing sensor,swallow sensor, temperature sensor, and pressure sensor.

In an example, this invention can include a tamper-resisting member thatdetects and responds if the person's actual weight gain or loss isinconsistent with the predicted weight gain or loss predicted by thecombination of the estimated caloric intake and the estimated caloricexpenditure.

In an example, this invention can be embodied in a tamper-resistantdevice that automatically monitors caloric intake comprising: one ormore automatic-imaging members that are worn on one or more locations ona person from which these members: collectively and automatically takepictures of the person's mouth when the person eats and take pictures ofa reachable food source when the person eats; wherein a reachable foodsource is a food source that the person can reach by moving their arm;wherein food can include liquid nourishment as well as solid food;wherein one or more automatic-imaging members collectively andautomatically take pictures of the person's mouth and pictures of areachable food source, when the person eats, without the need for humanintervention, when the person eats, to activate picture taking; andwherein the fields of vision from one or more automatic-imaging memberscollectively and automatically encompass the person's mouth and areachable food source, when the person eats, without the need for humanintervention, when the person eats, to manually aim an imaging membertoward the person's mouth or toward the reachable food source; atamper-resisting mechanism which detects and responds if the operationof the one or more automatic-imaging members is impaired; wherein atamper-resisting member comprises a sensor that detects and responds ifthe line of sight from one or more automatic-imaging members to theperson's mouth or to a food source is impaired when a person is probablyeating based on a sensor, wherein this sensor is selected from the groupconsisting of: accelerometer, inclinometer, motion sensor, pedometer,sound sensor, smell sensor, blood pressure sensor, heart rate sensor,EEG sensor, ECG sensor, EMG sensor, electrochemical sensor, gastricactivity sensor, GPS sensor, location sensor, image sensor, opticalsensor, piezoelectric sensor, respiration sensor, strain gauge,electrogoniometer, chewing sensor, swallow sensor, temperature sensor,and pressure sensor; and an image-analyzing member which automaticallyanalyzes pictures of the person's mouth and pictures of the reachablefood source in order to estimate not just what food is at the reachablefood source, but the types and quantities of food that are actuallyconsumed by the person; and wherein the image-analyzing member uses oneor more methods selected from the group consisting of: patternrecognition or identification; human motion recognition oridentification; face recognition or identification; gesture recognitionor identification; food recognition or identification; word recognitionor identification; logo recognition or identification; bar coderecognition or identification; and 3D modeling.

In an example, this invention can be embodied in a tamper-resistantmethod for automatically monitoring caloric intake comprising: having aperson wear one or more automatic-imaging members at one or morelocations on the person from which these members collectively andautomatically take pictures of the person's mouth when the person eatsand pictures of a reachable food source when the person eats; wherein areachable food source is a food source that the person can reach bymoving their arm; and wherein food can include liquid nourishment aswell as solid food; detecting and responding if the operation of the oneor more automatic-imaging members is impaired; and automaticallyanalyzing pictures of the person's mouth and pictures of the reachablefood source in order to estimate the types and quantities of food thatare consumed by the person.

FIGS. 23-30 show two four-frame series of pictures taken by a roughprototype device that was worn on a person's wrist. These four-framepicture series capture movement of the field of vision from two cameras,as the person's arm and hand moved to transport food along the foodconsumption pathway. These pictures have been transformed from gradientfull-color images into black-and-white dot images in order to conform tothe figure requirements for a U.S. patent. In practice, these pictureswould likely be analyzed as full-gradient full-color images for optimalimage analysis and pattern recognition.

FIGS. 23-26 show a four-frame series of pictures taken by the movingfield of vision from a first camera that was worn on the anteriorsurface of the person's wrist, like a wrist watch. This first cameragenerally pointed away from the person's face and toward a reachablefood source as the person moved their arm and hand to transport foodalong the food consumption pathway. This first camera had an imagingvector that was generally perpendicular to the longitudinal bones of theperson's upper arm.

FIG. 23 shows the picture taken by this first camera at the distalendpoint of the food consumption pathway. This first picture shows aportion of a bowl, 2301, which represents a reachable food source. FIGS.24-26 show subsequent pictures in this series taken by the first cameraas the person moved their arm and hand so as to move food up to theirmouth along the food consumption pathway. FIGS. 24 and 25 provideadditional pictures of portions of the bowl 2301. In FIG. 26, the bowlis no longer in the field of vision of the camera at the proximalendpoint of the food consumption pathway. It is important to note thatthis camera worn on the person's wrist automatically encompasses thereachable food source in its field of vision as the arm and hand movefood along the food consumption pathway, without any need for manualaiming or activation of the camera.

In the figures shown here, bowl 2301 represents a reachable food source,but no actual food is shown in it. In practice, bowl 2301 would havefood in it. This device and method would analyze the series of picturesof food in the bowl (in FIGS. 23-25) in order to identify the type, andestimate the volume, of food in the bowl—in conjunction with images ofthe person's mouth and interaction between the person's mouth and food.In this example, the reachable food source is food in a bowl. In otherexamples, the reachable food source may be selected from the groupconsisting of: food on a plate, food in a bowl, food in a glass, food ina cup, food in a bottle, food in a can, food in a package, food in acontainer, food in a wrapper, food in a bag, food in a box, food on atable, food on a counter, food on a shelf, and food in a refrigerator.

FIGS. 27-30 show a four-frame series of pictures taken by the movingfield of vision from a second camera that was also worn on the anteriorsurface of the person's wrist, like a wrist watch. However, this secondcamera generally pointed toward the person's face and away from areachable food source as the person moved their arm and hand totransport food along the food consumption pathway. Like the firstcamera, this second camera had an imaging vector that was generallyperpendicular to the longitudinal bones of the person's upper arm.However, this second camera had an imaging vector that was rotated 180degrees around the person's wrist as compared to the imaging vector ofthe first camera.

FIG. 27 shows the picture taken by this first camera at the distalendpoint of the food consumption pathway. This first picture does notinclude the person's mouth. However, as the person moves their arm andhand upwards during the food consumption pathway, this second camera didcapture images of the person's mouth, 2701, as shown in FIGS. 28 and 29.In FIG. 30, the person's mouth is no longer in the field of vision ofthe camera at the proximal endpoint of the food consumption pathway.This second camera, worn on the person's wrist, automaticallyencompasses the person's mouth in its field of vision as the arm andhand moves food along the food consumption pathway, without any need formanual aiming or activation of the camera.

The pictures shown in FIGS. 23-30 are only one example of the types ofpictures that can be taken by an embodiment of this device. Thisembodiment is only a rough prototype comprising a wrist-worn imagingmember with two opposite-facing cameras that are perpendicular to thebones of the person's upper arm. As described previously in thisdescription of the figures, there are many variations and refinementsthat could improve the ability of one or more automatic-imaging membersto automatically and collectively encompass a reachable food source anda person's mouth while they eat.

However, even these simple pictures from a rough prototype provideencouraging preliminary evidence that this device can work. This isearly evidence that this device can comprise one or more wearableautomatic-imaging devices that automatically and collectively takepictures of a reachable food source and the person's mouth, when theperson eats, without the need for manual aiming or picture activation,when the person eats. These pictures can then be analyzed to estimatethe types and quantities of food consumed which, in turn, are used toestimate the person's caloric intake. The relatively automatic,tamper-resistant, and involuntary characteristics of this device andmethod make it superior to the prior art for monitoring and measuringcaloric intake.

FIGS. 31 and 32 show an example of a device that doubles as eyewear andcan be used to measure and/or modify a person's food consumption. Inthis example, wearable EEG monitor 3101 comprises a plurality ofelectrodes or other brain activity sensors (including 3103) and twowearable cameras (including 3102 shown on the left side). In thisexample, this device is assumed to be left-right symmetric, so a secondcamera is assumed to be on the right side of the person's head. In anexample, wearable EEG monitor 3101 can further comprise a control unit.In an example, this control unit can comprise a power source, dataprocessor, and data transmitter.

As shown in FIGS. 31 and 32, the anterior portion of wearable EEGmonitor 3101 comprises an eyewear frame. In this example, this eyewearframe includes lenses. In an example, this eyewear frame can include adisplay surface instead of lenses. In an example, lenses can function asa display surface. In an example, this eyewear frame can be rigid,semi-rigid, or flexible.

As shown in FIGS. 31 and 32, the posterior portion of wearable EEGmonitor 3101 comprises an arcuate member which loops around thelower-rear portion of the back of the person's head at a level which isequal to, or lower than, the person's ears. The sides of this devicerest on top of the person's ears. In an example, this posterior arcuateportion of this device can have the same degree of rigidity,flexibility, and/or elasticity as the anterior eyewear frame portion ofthis device. In an example, this posterior arcuate portion of thisdevice can have a higher degree of flexibility and/or elasticity thanthe anterior eyewear frame portion of this device. In an example, theanterior eyewear frame portion of this device can be made of metaland/or plastic and the posterior arcuate portion of this device can bemade of fabric.

As shown in FIGS. 31 and 32, the two wearable cameras (including 3102 onthe left side) of this device can take stereoscopic pictures of foodwhen the person is looking at food (see FIG. 31) and when the person iseating food (see FIG. 32). In an example, having images of food bothbefore and during consumption can enable more accurate identification offood type and more accurate measure of food quantity consumed. Also,stereoscopic imaging of food can enable 3D and volumetric modeling tobetter estimate the quantity of food consumed.

FIG. 32 shows a change 3201 in electromagnetic brain activity that istriggered when the person eats food. This change 3201 in electromagneticbrain activity is measured by wearable EEG monitor 3101. This change3201 in brain activity based on food consumption is then linked topreviously-identified patterns of food consumption and used to estimatethe type and quantity of food consumed.

FIG. 33 shows another example of a wearable EEG monitor (3301) with anintegrated eyewear frame which measures and/or modifies a person's foodconsumption. In this example, wearable EEG monitor 3301 comprises aplurality of EEG sensors (including 3303) and a wearable camera 3302.This device also comprises a power source (3304), a data processor(3305), and a data transmitter (3306). In this example, the device:spans backward from the bridge of the person's nose to a position atopthe person's left ear; then curves up and over the top of the person'shead; then curves down to a position atop the person's right ear; andthen spans forward to the bridge of the person's nose.

Variations discussed elsewhere in this disclosure and priority-linkeddisclosures (e.g. FIG. 27 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No.61/932,517) can also be applied to this example. In an example, thecamera can be automatically activated to take pictures when a personconsumes food based on analysis of data from the plurality of EEGsensors. In an example, the data processor can analyze data from theplurality of EEG sensors to detect when the person consumes food and cananalyze images from the camera to identify the types and quantities offood which the person consumes to estimate the person's caloric intake.

FIG. 34 shows another example of a wearable EEG monitor (3401) with anintegrated eyewear frame which measures and/or modifies a person's foodconsumption. In this example, wearable EEG monitor 3401 comprises aplurality of EEG sensors (including 3403) and a wearable camera 3402.This device also comprises a power source (3404), a data processor(3405), and a data transmitter (3406). In this example, an anteriorportion of wearable EEG monitor 3401 is an eyewear frame. In thisexample, a posterior portion of wearable EEG monitor 3401: starts nearthe bottom of the left ear, curves up around the rear of the left ear,loops over the top of the person's head, curves down around the rear ofthe right ear, and then ends near the bottom of the right ear.

Variations discussed elsewhere in this disclosure and priority-linkeddisclosures (e.g. FIG. 26 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No.61/932,517) can also be applied to this example. In an example, thecamera can be automatically activated to take pictures when a personconsumes food based on analysis of data from the plurality of EEGsensors. In an example, the data processor can analyze data from theplurality of EEG sensors to detect when the person consumes food and cananalyze images from the camera to identify the types and quantities offood which the person consumes to estimate the person's caloric intake.

I claim:
 1. A device for monitoring food consumption comprising: aneyewear frame with a posterior portion which is configured to start at aleft ear, loop over the top of a person's head, and then end at theright ear; a plurality of EEG sensors on the posterior portion of theeyewear frame, wherein the locations of at least two of the plurality ofEEG sensors on the posterior portion of the eyewear frame are identifiedaccording to the International 10-20 System and/or the ModifiedCombinatorial Nomenclature (MCN), and wherein the locations of the atleast two of the plurality of EEG sensors on the posterior portion ofthe eyewear frame are selected from the group consisting of: C3, C4, Cz,CP3, CP4, CPz, P3, P4, and Pz; a camera which is automatically activatedto take pictures when a person consumes food based on analysis of datafrom the plurality of EEG sensors; a power source; and a data processorwhich is specifically programmed to: analyze data from the plurality ofEEG sensors to detect when the person consumes food; and analyze imagesfrom the camera to identify the types and quantities of food which theperson consumes to estimate the person's caloric intake.